UFO Speculations : Is It All Hype Or Hyper-Reality?

I have been interested in UFO’s and the idea of alien life since early childhood.  I had seen a few strange things as a child, and a few as an adult.


I will reference only the two most recent times when I was with someone else who saw the objects with me; spheres in one case, and a large angled back triangle of blocked out stars rapidly moving across the star field on a moonless night.  Hold up your hand as far as possible over your head and spread it wide; about like that.

I do not know if these somewhat classic descriptions of kinds of UFO events are military vehicles.  I have seen the B-2 Stealth plane fly over Tucson, but I believe it made a noticable sound when flying low.  The profile of the stars being blackout phenomenon I mentioned seeing could be one of those flying at approx 1,000 foot altitude—if it is silent with no glowing aspects. The edge of the missing star-field also seemed smooth and not jagged.

I did not see any of the UFO’s often otherwise referenced in the Arizona UFO stories that I have heard of—mostly lights and or visible objects with lights, not of the spherical kind I saw that fly in formations of some kind.  (Former governors experience link below.)


There is no consensus about where UFO’s are coming from, meaning the ones not hoaxes or misread plane, weather or other earthly anomalous events.  In fact, if I can say that honestly here; “fact”, there may be many kinds of UFO external origins; external to out planet or external to our spacetime.  We also are not certain where life on earth actually originated. So as a rank naive UFO speculator not doing research myself on what others think, I will imagine what I might about the phenomenon.


UFO’s may be robotic vehicles monitoring earth or otherwise checking our state of civilization and technology, with any number of reasons as to why.  They, or some, might be from the future, don’t know. They may be space tourist, after all we are interested in everything out there.  They might be cosmic researchers and scientist, acting in ways that such folks do; testing subjects.  Could be on a kind of spiritual journey to see what Life is creating.  Might be keeping an eye on us to eventually act to keep our conflict model out of the heavens.  Remember I am saying might be.  If predators, like many of us, they might be waiting for the best time to harvest.  I doubt that myself, but that could be my wishful thinking, so I’d advise you to taste bad.



If life became conscious such as we modern humans, but billions of years ago, we may be visited all the time and never know it.  So called aliens could be part of the world we see, but assume to be inanimate or unconscious aspects of nature, or watch us from another dimension somehow.  Things such as a human mass unconscious or subconsciousness may be monitored by “them”, ( including our thoughts {along with God and Santa Clause?}).  They might not even be true individuals as we think of them.  Extrapolating off of our rapid internet advancement, why they may watch and giggle/snort/shine/haze? over what you and I are doing here. With likely advance deciphering of logic ability, they should in some manner comprehend most all we are about with our little blogs.  Solipsistic?  Maybe.


If we are actually creatures in a much advanced rendering of a virtual reality, it could well be designed to seem a real existence to us.  Real then becomes even more relative.  Does my blog actually know i is a blog?  I hope I don’t think so.

Physics, or our atempt to define the physical world, may be trying to decipher the insides of a virtual reality event.  ESP, may be a kind of bleed through in this virtual reality.  Repetitive haunting events; such as see-through soldiers seen returning into the woods at alleged Civil War battlefields, could “show” how a loop in this virtual reality gets locked in and partly imprinted indefinitely.  UFO’s under these speculative circumstances could then be system checks, kids playing, or who knows what.  –From first Star Trek alien child—-‘I could of!; I could of!.’



A scary thought about the UFO’s sighted around military installations, then apparently pursued by military vehicles is; we are showing them what we have in their field!  As they sped away beyond our reach, or blink through space to many miles away, oops; they learn we cannot catch them.  They also learn how relatively primitive our stuff is.  All part of preparations for invasion I assume?  Not necessarily.

An even more unsettling scenario would be; aliens engage with government/corporate entities to make the value of earth as a unique planet, a commodity to be brokered.  In effect; we will let you do this if you do this other thing for us.  They have us over a planetary barrel.  A kind of unholy alliance then ensues with opportunism and survival as its core value.

Too all UFO bloggers out there; We humans are not good food.  We often do not know what we are really eating or doing.  Genetically modified who knows what is spreading all over our food sources, so cosmic consumer beware.


Declassified UFO Files Reveal Military Engagement, Near-Collision

more stuff—


{Photo’s and artwork not on links by me–UFO ones faked with camera editing}

Flowers in Late Afternoon

-Sunlight happened to penetrate deep into the house where I noticed this nice illumination.


-I only slept a few hours yesterday, then was off for doing set-up and takedown for a local event (volunteer).  A very long day but I still had to do my physical therapy.  The cat wondered what I was up to.  She goes just about wherever I go.


Porcupine Pajama Pants

Porcupine Pajama Pants

These Quills were driven into my pajama’s as I walked up a hill quickly to get a few weather photo’s yesterday. they sting a little as they hop onboard for the ride.




Patagonia Mountain Sunset Buildup In Arizona On October 19

Patagonia Mountain Sunset Buildup On October 19

-Weather experts suggested moisture from hurricane Rick made it to Arizona.  We have an approaching front from the northwest and a slight chance of sever weather where I am.  Last evenings cloud buildup.



Love Means Love To 4-8 Year Olds; What has Love got to do with it? Everything

{This was forwarded to me in an e-mail}


Slow down for three minutes to read this. It is so worth it. Touching words from the mouth of babes.
A group of professional people posed this question to a group of 4 to 8 year-olds, ‘What does love mean?’

The answers they got were broader and deeper than anyone could have imagined See what you think:

‘When my grandmother got arthritis, she couldn’t bend over and paint her toenails anymore.
So my grandfather does it for her all the time, even when his hands got arthritis too. That’s love.’

Rebecca- age 8

‘When someone loves you, the way they say your name is different.

You just know that your name is safe in their mouth.’

Billy – age 4

‘Love is when a girl puts on perfume and a boy puts on shaving cologne and they go out and smell each other.’

Karl – age 5

‘Love is when you go out to eat and give somebody most of your French fries without making them give you any of theirs..’

Chrissy – age 6

‘Love is what makes you smile when you’re tired.’

Terri – age 4

‘Love is when my mommy makes coffee for my daddy and she takes a sip before giving it to him, to make sure the taste is OK.’

Danny – age 7

‘Love is what’s in the room with you at Christmas if you stop opening presents and listen.’

Bobby – age 7 (Wow!)

‘If you want to learn to love better, you should start with a friend who you hate,’

Nikka – age 6
(we need a few million more Nikka’s on this planet)

‘Love is when you tell a guy you like his shirt, then he wears it everyday.’

Noelle – age 7

‘Love is like a little old woman and a little old man who are still friends even after they know each other so well.’

Tommy – age 6

‘During my piano recital, I was on a stage and I was scared.

I looked at all the people watching me and saw my daddy waving and smiling.
He was the only one doing that.  I wasn’t scared anymore.’

Cindy – age 8

‘My mommy loves me more than anybody.
You don’t see anyone else kissing me to sleep at night.’

Clare – age 6

‘Love is when Mommy gives Daddy the best piece of chicken.’

Elaine-age 5

‘Love is when Mommy sees Daddy smelly and sweaty and still says he is handsomer than Robert Redford..’

Chris – age 7

‘Love is when your puppy licks your face even after you left him alone all day.’

Mary Ann – age 4

‘I know my older sister loves me because she gives me all her old clothes and has to go out and buy new ones.’

Lauren – age 4

‘When you love somebody, your eyelashes go up and down and little stars come out of you.’ (what an image)

Karen – age 7

‘You really shouldn’t say ‘I love you’ unless you mean it. But if you mean it, you should say it a lot. People forget.’

Jessica – age 8

And the final one

The winner was a four year old child whose next door neighbor was an elderly gentleman who had recently lost his wife.
Upon seeing the man cry, the little boy went into the old gentleman’s yard, climbed onto his lap, and just sat there.

When his Mother asked what he had said to the neighbor, the little boy said,

‘Nothing, I just helped him cry’

Above Our Heads : Ideas Spreading Across The Universe

[picapp src=”7/5/6/4/Hubbles_Panoramic_Portrait_f617.jpg?adImageId=5033109&imageId=3410056″ width=”500″ height=”356″ /]

{This post began while musing over space aliens observing us}

We.  All of us. We are all at the mercy of time and the processes of existence.  We happen to have minds with self aware cognition, able to reflect upon ourselves and all the relationships around us.  But we do not always know the reality of our thoughts about the things of our world.  My mind does not accurately reflect reality as it is, for my imagination and that of others can act as a coloring agent or interpreter of what I experience.  Add to that all I do not know of myself, you and our world, and mistaken impressions seem destined to occur no matter my intention.  Do I have a means or a method for learning what I do not know of my alienation to others experience and belief?

We seem real.  Our thoughts seem real.  Yet what I am thinking of, real as it may seem to my mind, does not make “it” a fact of reality.  I am sure the sun revolves around the earth from empirical evidence, but my context of seeing is inhibited by my place.  I can then be confident that you are wrong when you say the earth circles the sun, or that it rotates daily around an axis.  Odds are, if most think, (and many of our distant ancestors thought the sun revolves around the earth), negative associations will be heeped upon the iconoclast, the rebel, the heretic, who claims things beyond obvious perception.

This opens up a new dimension of a kind of intentional deception seemingly mandated by prior assumptions.  Intentional, for it is insisted upon.  It also cast conformity as conservative confidence walled up inside of a question free zone.  A place where reality itself, is intentionally excluded from consideration for the emotional confidence of the previous status quo. A kind of “common sense”, in this case an appearance reality, provides our experience with the confidence of the sun rising and setting, seeming to circle the earth.

As we agree to this common sense event, we create a consensus reality, or common agreement on the awareness of the state of a thing.  Yet in this simple planet and sun example, context is everything regarding actual truth.  An overview, or higher consciousness, in this case via scientific observations, will reveal a partial true nature of our local cosmic reality.  Yet human pre determined ideas will, as they did, attempt to demean the unveiling truth and its messengers, while defending the honor and correctness of conserved belief. Our human experience of the sun circling the earth was declared something akin to sacred, as are any manner of other ideas society defines as appearing a certain way, then agreeing that way is The Way.  Others with differing notions can then be pushed, shoved or buried out of the way, for they seem to desire to cast insecurity and question over the very honesty of our tenets on our place in the known world.  Not being of our consensus view, these others will seem as other, and perhaps as alien.

Seeing what is not apparently obvious is a bad place to be socially.  You are not likely taken seriously, and you may well find countless experts to agree with how you appear;– too not be taken seriously.  We tend to have many mechanisms for intellectually challenging paradigm challenging information.  Rationalization instead of rational reason, will explain our emotional plight; that a kind of alien influence is attempting to overturn our world view.  Now history and hereditary pride can be called up as sacred icons defended in the name of God or Life.

Ideas and opinions are not the actual reality check on the truthfulness of any one thing, but these days we seem unsure wether opinion and debate determine reality, or actual facts in true context.  This is not necessarily true in all things I do.  Just as a poll does not decide reality of fact, 90% of people saying the earth revolves around the sun is not proof of its reality; facts in context will be.  The higher the context conceived, the more real may be the connections defined as relevant.  But we can find that even a truthful contextual consideration can be relative to confirming our existing biases, and not changing our minds toward a more truthful reality in perception.  If we seek pure objectivity or truth, our job may be never finished and walked away from.

What is the real intention of ones inquiry?  Even Context Has Apparent And Consensus Parameters Limited By Knowledge Or Its Lack

You can give me hot or cold objects to feel, but you are not the source of those definitions of temperature; where you are getting them from likely is.  You may have some in the refrigerator, and some out in the sun.  You may have put those objects there to change something in the apperance of their nature.  We can then both begin to determine how their conditional state is attracting what we observe of them.  We may also being to see your role in determining a things perceived things state of being.

Context keeps expanding to include greater definition and possible impression cognition of cause. I can see that you bring me these differences, but you are not necessarily the true cause of their condition. You may be a participant in the process of transferring information to me, your ideas may have led the objects to acquire their seeming states of hot or cold.  You might be testing my sensitivity to temperature, and that may be relative to my nervous systems settings.  A thermometer might better determine real temperature variations between these objects.  We even can establish issues of subjective impression or of factual objective information.  You may have left an ice cube out in the sun for a while, but I might perceive that the one from the refrigerator and the one from out in the sun are still just as cold to me.  What changed may be then held in other criterion of observation.  Even facts can be manipulated to desired outcome if so construed.  Critical thinking ability is actually important to observing the universe honestly, by trying to not impair sensory information.


What’s behind my closed hands?  My closed ideas?

Our lives are full of ideas and “truths” wrapped and spun into all manner of what may well be cognition management of concepts that we may not be aware of.  Those giving these things to us may be aware of greater contextual rendering involved in any one things “issues” of manifestation.  A Pandoras Box of manipulation opens when I am not made aware of these other variations in cause to the whys for a thing or process.  Relative awareness is obviously then highly prone to manipulation, particularly if I am not aware of the may ways I can be fooled into being sure or certain of anything.

Why.  Only a liar would tell you the earth goes around the sun.  Someone is trying to fool your own eyes!  Open them!

The trouble with ignorance, whether unintentionally perpetuated or defended for status or other opportunistic reason, is that it is easily defended by emotionalized poisoning of the messenger tactics.  Someone pointing out what is scientifically a true observation, as the earth revolving around the sun, were called names to connveigh the shame and possible ostracism, or worse, one will receive if such information is considered objectively. Conformity to conserved ideas are adhered to loyally, as if truth is not open to debate, prior assumptions being held above truth itself..  This is a dangerous conclusion pertaining to how we sense reality and adjust to survival in a changing universe.  For some interest then, critical thinking will be something to be biased against, while substitutes for it are inserted as rationalization.

We are often, in effect, directed not to know the truth, to shun those suggesting it, to instead, allege the (actual) truth is a deceptive falsehood being perpetuated by sinister forces.  These days perhaps “intellectual elites” of “valueless” scientific theory.  In some ways, reality gets reversed, the truth bearer is called the liar, while those with incomplete truth called, often by self definition in question free zones, as the loyal or honorable ones upholding truth itself.

Many areas of religion, politics, and occasionally scientific theory, are defended with conserved notions held in question free zones.  Conservatism itself, becomes a likely place to find “truths” not allowed to be questioned in any fundamental way.  We all tend to conserve ideas that serve or seem to confirm our world views or spiritual ones.  But how honorable is a bias towards instituting ignorance as a cherished value to be loyally defended?

It is highly likely that many kinds of what are actually propaganda and institutional attempts to control and direct human consciousness are dirrected at us continually.  These, like the rejection of science as a means to determining states of reality, just as likely get inserted into question free zones, designed to control appearance reality and set up kinds of consensus reality’s in us to direct personal and collective actions into our environments.  These, if deceptive, will likely contain much emotionalized ad-hominen debunking; where attitude and prejudice are consisdered healthy, and empowered, self righteously conceived of as agents of defending God, truth, country, values or family.

It is most important to notice where shaming, blaming, and other emotionalized tag-framing of personality character lacks, are routinely administered in ways as to show otherness.  This alienation and separation identity is often intended to poison the free consideration of ideas and factual data, for why would you honestly consider information from those who are said to be fools, deceived, no good, evil, or against your way of life?  Question, and so identifying full truth, successfully diverted by avoidance rationalization.  After all, you know the sun revolves around the earth. You see it do so every day.  What are those suggesting otherwise up to?



There is a war in heaven, in consciousness, and it is to contain and control who and what and how we may be, and not for determining the real factual reality we inhabit. Instead, we are lead to confirm, and so buttress preexisting bias that most likely favors status quo power relationships dependent upon kinds of pyramid schemes, where human or animal energy is harvested to the benefit of some more than others.  But what is actually in my own good interest?

In other words; selfishness vs inclusion; arrogance vs understanding; deception vs reality…and we decide who’s side we each are on, even if not knowing we are deciding for one reason or another.  We may pivot to our aloneness, or to our union while not being aware of the spiritual choice made by our actions.

The battle goes on.  The casualties being not only aspects of our transitory human lives, but the ideas that live beyond our breath.  One day we may find that intelligence not only inhabits all things, but actually avoids those things which would pollute it with falsehood.  Now there is a contradiction in being, or is there?