Long Time No Rhyme

Long Time No Rhyme

===============================

Moonrust

Wait?

why wait?

bite this bait

Its called elections

pretends to be Democracy,

squirms as an impaled worm

alleges Freedom

but of its children

it demands pledges

YES!!!

Money talks, then stalks the facts

like that Sasquatch old footage

going forward gazing back

last moments sunlight

rusted without rain

never quite to be found this time around

and around

dizzy

Democracy

nearly extinct meltdown

drowning in a bathtub

rising “values” voting

moral crusaders

hiding immoral background

handcuffs upon our moon,

powdered crater face smooth smile

our circus is backward around

this time around

.

.

.

.

.

.{photo: Benafia}

 

 

Free Speech And The First Amendment

This article based on:

(Support the First Amendment with 1 for All)

Abstractions are inherently relative; Free From What Or Whom?

And then there is context;—Where and under what conditions does this freedom exist?

For the conditions upon Free Speech; remember; You cannot yell fire in a crowded theater just to see what happens, not and remain free.  You cannot lobby for armed overthrow of the Government (conservatives excluded?), etc.  It seems once this conditional, or exception caveat to an abstractions existence is made obvious, any number of reasons for not having Free Speech become both sensible and most assuredly right?  Most everyone will say so.  Just think of plagiarism, slander, libel and perjury as big NOs to your Free Speech privilege.  Yet politicians have the right to lie about one another in campaigns, which some take as a mandate.

You cannot share privy stock info, (ex Martha Stewart), and I suppose I am not free to tell all about your social security or credit card numbers.  We say unconditional Free Speech, but once looked at more closely in specifics, all kinds of exceptions seem obvious for The 1 Good of All.

Is Free Speech In The Ear and Eye Of The Beholder?

We seem to have this standard of collective care; Free Speech is not allowed on spoken and unspoken contracts between people where the release of information can cause harm to one.  Your doctor, pastor, rabbi or priest, your lawyer, these kinds of agreements have some controls on Free Speech, but may have them for the good of all? Conversely, the Government is allowed to listen in on where you thought you were in private Free Speech space, outside the dimensions of public Free Speech.  The “Patriot Act”, wiretaps, confiscating files etc., things that are intrinsically speech, seem to enter zones of exception.  Freedom is then existential, its meaning often depending upon ones position and belief system.

Freedom appears to be in the mind of the beholder, where truth, fiction, fact and fantasy can all mix to create the need for Freedom over human conceptual designs that may not exist in reality, or be of quite a differing nature than conceived.

The paranoia promoters of the Right Wing and Left Wing have conspiracy theories all over the constitutional boards, of how the other is out to take your rights away.  I remember during the Bush administration that the police or FBI came into a young woman’s college bedroom to interrogate her because someone reported her as having a negative Bush poster up.  Amnesia is usually highly selective on what some extremes wish to recall about others Free Speech compared to their own often emotional based (beyond objective review of context) rationalization.

I may wish to be free from the oppressive “Obamacare”, but Obamacare is a focus group/think tank concept, and not an actual thing.  We often mimic from other sources what we claim to think all for ourselves. When under these kinds of mind control influence, I can wish to be free from a thing that exist in the mind and not the real world, yet I project fault, liability, and any manner of righteous indignation at real people and real policies.

Conformity As The WEight Upon Free Speech

Courts; both Conservative activist types and Liberal, claim vague consensus biases—ex. community standards, limit Free Speech.  What you wear can be called not acceptable to court, the public, or to work.  If what you say seems to suggest the creation of someones perception of trouble, you may be called inappropriate.  “I was fired because I got a tatoo!“  In fact, it seems much Freedom is put on hold while under the reigns of an employer or other power over relationships.  “Hey You! Yes you! Who you looking at!

Art and how one looks or otherwise expresses their life style, can be called not right for prime time viewing; not to be heard or seen by the unawares public.  Surely you have some things in mind that you wish not to be seen, and wish someone, (must be the Government(?)), from not letting it out in the open.  In liberal(?) California, they voted against the gay for concern of the erosion of family values, morals, and or some idea that the gay idea was not welcome into certain human arenas.  We seem entitled to limit other consenting adults for how we think of them and not any position of their right to be who they are if not directly or intentional harming others.  We can be against one another’s Freedom.

.

So what is the Public Interest in Free Speech? Why is the absolutist, no infringements upon Free Speech, highly conditional in “practical” reality?

No one ever said Free Speech (or other Freedoms) only made things good, yet the abstraction is promoted in self interest as only beneficial. It seems we have become conditioned to exceptions upon Free Speech, because they do not seem to us to be good or healthy to society. In actuality, Freedom comes with kinds of responsibility and accountability that many may wish to avoid since those sides of the coin of Whole Context feel contravening to the celebrated liberty nature of Freedom.

Some see their favored Freedom as a kind of escapism clause; “I want to get rich and buy anything I want but not be held liable to my impacts on society or the environment, for that would be taking my freedom away! Duh! Down with Big Government and taxes!!!” A whole philosophy of the dis-con-nected individual has ensued, granted space in reason by the seductive natures of alienation, greed and opportunism, which want no accountability to a Whole or any fully framed “We The People”.  Instead, we reserve the right to do whatever we can or can seem to get away with, not wishing to see or know the small print of interconnection that governs all Life and Being.

It seems that God or Nature, however, do keep accounts of responsibility to conditions and situations, Climate Change being perhaps a universal judgement upon behavior.  This may well indicate that one does not “get way” with what one thinks one does when narrowing the consciousness on Freedom, Accountability and more significantly–Connection.

The business growth paradigm for instance, so similar to pathology and to cancers “strategy”. These seeming imperatives wrap themselves into glorious achievement and individual initiative narrative, with rewards as obvious proof of value and validation, helping to stack the deck against Freedoms other ramifications.

Control of narrative identity frames is a must for programming cognitive barriers to awareness.  This is the Big Business of Mind Control in todays modern world of conspicuous consumption, identity desire and focus, with denial of negative effect.

A truncated concept of freedom and self initiative, and their rewards, is then erected to serve as a rationalization edifice for their apparent consensus rightness and goodness.  This will be heavy with seductive emotionalizations and denunciations, a hallmark of many an ideologue or demigod.  Tagging it to God makes it even more alluring.

Self And Other Censorship; Paradoxical Freedom Issues

A society with liberal institutions such as Freedom, must understand why the troubles with Freedom, which make for big Repub/Dems party propaganda campaigns, never promised only the good.  There is an understanding that the removal of those Freedoms, their absence historically, will open a Pandora’s Box of much worse controlling influences than the freedom’s problems ever did. But the Good of All seems to demand practical adjustments, which most of us support in one manner or another.

For the most Freedom for All, an active Government is the current only guarantor.  Get rid of Government, and the vacuum will likely be filled by the new nation states of multinational corporations, who will instruct you on what is or is not acceptable behavior from you for their own bottom line interest where you have no vote or freedom of expression necessarily, unlike in Democracy.  Yet many a libertine is desperate to arrive at this state, albeit unknowingly, so that makes it OK?. We may pursue the liberation of Freedom while in effect, sealing It and our fate with our own ignorance.  Ignorance is a tremendous commodity in building manipulation strategies of influence.

We are easily seduced away from abstraction absolutism by “obvious” practicalities applying to the society we would prefer, and what seems to be the interest of The Whole.  Other rights are not what some conceive them to be. The exceptions to the possession of unabridged rights are already in place. For instance, the Second Amendment does not seem to allow us to posses our own nuclear  weapon’s, or crowd control, nor other devices that can render gun ownership obsolete in the grand “defend my own” sense, but not in the paranoid, or the “At least I can shoot you!” one (FYI I am a gun owner.).

And by the way, that ultimate Free Speech; the Right to Vote, is conditional, not a “Right” at all.  Many folks are deprived from voting by law often as a punitive measure.  Not an absolute Freedom of expression in the full idea of it.  Most of us are for all kinds of censorship in practice, but not when it seems to effect or interest.

{Here is a link regarding the consequences of a debate forum’s aftermath.}

Oprah Winfrey and mad cows – SourceWatch

.

We may excercise our Free Speech to Deride Others Free Speech—————————————————————————————————————————

The political divide seems to have its notions of what the other side should not be saying.  This seems to be accepted as part of Free Speech, but when does it become something else?

I remember some folks at Fox News threatening to send their own people over to harass or otherwise make uncomfortable those not agreeing with their view of the Bush administrations policies.  I guess harassment is protected by Free Speech.  Hate speech seems to be as well. Here some recognise that Free Speech is not always cookies and cream.

Then there are your and my prejudices

The Freedom Of Conformity?

——-just another word for nothing left to loose.” — Janice Joplin

-

But I am obviously for Freedom!  Let Freedom Ring!!!

Freedom vs other oversight

There was a recent “official” article on WordPress regarding a behavioral point that said something like this; Read the kind of post on the WordPress homepage to see the way people speak who have their post featured.  In the comments after I remember someone saying; ‘Actually, the title you put down seems the best one to me.’

It may be good business to care for appearances; I remember the same thing being said in Mother Earth News; ‘Talk like those featured talk (write) and you might get posted.’, or back then, your article considered for printing. I had often wondered why the articles often seemed to be written by the same person, with the same attitude and overenthusiastic indulgence.  I never sent an article in because of that condition.  “I did it my way!Sinatra Song Often Strikes Deadly Chord – NYTimes.com

Here then, Free Speech is judged according to an editor or other content oversight, for “The Good” of the organizations intended audience or its internal provincial “right” style.  Style becomes perhaps more valued than substance. Appearances are held more noteworthy than content, reducing the varied expressions of the individual, in some ways controlling and contorting true Freedom of Speech.

So with the best on an institutions intentions, expression is altered, the individuals real voice called inappropriate for promotional public view. This falls under the management or editors conception of how a thing should look and sound from you. There are standards to uphold we all would agree.

Freedom Falls

Freedom Falls under these conditions; Perception; Conceptual Design; Appearance Reality; often folded into Consensus Reality; these buttressed by Confirmation Bias; all under the auspices of Power Groups Status Elites and Manipulation Requirements at home and around the world.  Within this matrix of control and established order, you and I may argue and wonder as to the reasons for things, unawares of overarching context framing the entire issue.


-





-

-

-

Share

Taxing Away Your Freedom!!! ; NOT!

=

WHY CUTTING TAXES, AS A POLITICAL POSITION MANDATE, IS ACTUALLY CUTTING INTO FREEDOM

=

–WONDER HOW “CONSERVATIVE” SURFACE POLITICAL SHELL GAMES ARE ACTUALLY GAMING YOUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES AWAY?

=

From Truthout, an article about the relationships between taxes and freedom. Not the same as the “tax and spend liberals” ruse used by the well off to fool the less that tax money is money going to waste, being spent!  Other libertarians may see the tax notion as government interference in your freedom to do what you wish with your money;

THIS IGNORES THAT IN DEMOCRACIES WE ARE WHO INVEST IN SOCIETY WITH OUR TAX; EDUCATION, HEALTH, INFRASTRUCTURE, etc. THE KING, CORPORATION OR CHURCH IS NOT GOING TO THAT FOR US.

Again, this, liberty is all about me, interpretation of ones freedom as an abstract self contained absolute, ignores the whole context each life is in, and their always present interrelationships.  Pretending they are not there, or far away and abstract, able to be ignored if one wills for ones own “advance” is situationally seductive. That is opportunism at work at the expense of the Whole, while possibly loudly pretending to be defending Life, Liberty and Happiness.  Nice “individualistic” illusion, just false.

Ah—How little we may understand The Commons of Life.  Our lives context is a  Whole Thing, not just what is in my or your head, nor what would provide some stress relief for me while ignoring the greater context.

Unfortunately, the right is loaded with cognitive dissonance abatement platforms, packed with confirmation bias and disdain for objective information not fitting their ideological prism, or more accurately; prison.

-

Tax man, the democratic way.

More Taxes = More Democracy

by: Christian Chavagneux, Alternatives Économiques

NEWS

-

-

And the story goes on; Indoctrinate the faithful to separatist thinking. Folks believe they are defending the individuals freedom, for that is how the Appearance Reality’s formatted premise is rendered over and over.

Most all conservatism is truly old world, and no fan of Democracy or Liberty, but if it can trick the faithful followers into thinking they are right and true, well then; what is actually right and true will likely seem dishonest or deceitful.

Consensus Reality’s that permeate the conservative communities, are a collective agreement of some sort, that some thing or issue is true, not that it is actually true. It is not to be questioned without shame or threats of ostracism and alienation fears.  Their “truth” is declared true,  not to be questioned, so loyalty to a cause of ideology is presented and the ultimate good.  Questioners are to be attacked as being against the good as defined by subjective conservative thought parameters.  They have a perfect defense and offense; it is called ignorance, and it is butressed by shame and fear of alienation.

The pivot points of perception frame the individuals identity to its tagged values, be they real or imagined.  This creates the same effect for an ideology, where reason and rationalization are indistinguishable to the indoctrinated.

If the we of We The People are seduced to opportunistic conceptualizations of noble abstractions like Freedom, Liberty, happiness, Rights, and on, we side with separation over union.

In Democracy, We The People are the government.

Under the emerging corporate and theocratic inclined ideological matrix becoming the perceptual Zeitgeist in some circles;  A church/corporate/government, may develop with its propensity to delete Freedom and Liberty it finds not good for fixing its control.

Democracy gets demeaned from pulpits and propaganda outlets. To some extent this already happens with politicians targeting groups to deny voting “rights”. For examples of what the next government by and for the church/corporate theocratic state might look like after the big bad government is defeated; the Taliban, The Nazis, or The Communist are what were asking for.

Yes.  Just what some conservatives are always calling the Obama administration–socialist nazis, becomes the self described freedom fighters end game.

Preemptive conceptual tagging to frame the debate to the absurd via historical reference, while enabling the forces of fear and paranoia to stimulate the very impulses that lead to authoritarian and totalitarian elite control. Reality perception gets reversed for the best of intention, all stimulated by righteous demagogues.

This is why it is essential on the right, to have people faith based and not based on objectively verifiable true reality.  The ideological or ontological spin can then steal faithful minds in any direction by merely assembling a “connected dots” semblance of logic or reason.

————–

Some Quotes from a philosopher on elements of the issues at stake.

The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment.

——Bertrand Russell

————-

A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.

————-

Although profit is essentially a private tax, unlike government taxation in a Democracy, private tax hold no accountability to The Commons, and will likely demean all reference to greater responsibilities in a culture, by attaching all manner of ad-hominem condemnation to justify the private rationalization.

Democracy will then likely have a political party or parties dedicated to propaganda designed to enhance the identity interest of the have’s, and demote the identities of those without. This helps compartmentalized individual identity interest, while deriding the identity interest in others.

The tax that constructs the backbone of We The Peoples living context becomes seen as taking from the self and giving to the undeserving.  This does not mean that government is always right.  This is why we vote, but if we do not understand what the whole role of government is or must be to manifest ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’, we will undermine Democracy and Freedom while proclaiming them our cause.

The result of dividing and conquering perception of society, is a perception controled consciousness that “sees” others as not deserving of support, particularly support forced upon the individual via governments public tax.  Now Democracy itself is attacked while it can be claimed to be being defended.

Liberty is attacked from other angles, sometimes called “wedge issues”,  where the individual is encouraged to see isolated from context behavior as being the fault of liberalism, when liberalism created Democracy and respect for individual rights.  Again, all why these very abstractions are being alleged to be being defended by the wedge issue.

Demagoguery is relied upon because it works for those whose confirmation bias has been so inclined.  This is how lie and misstatement work even when later found to be actually untrue; confirmation bias remains reinforced by emotional loading of the weight of reason.  The power of propaganda is in it’s suscptable audiences perceptual bias, which has no real need for truth or accurate context.

————-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-


-

Share

The Socialism Scare Crow: THE FIGHT OF RAVENOUS MINDS


THE FIGHT OF RAVENOUS MINDS

photo-74

I came across a blog post yesterday. It said the threat for totalitarianism is from the left and not the right; BECAUSE the Nazis were socialist! Obviously only liberals can become “socialist”, and so, our authoritarian threat. Point made. Job done. Brilliant?

Now I think history shows that the far left and the far right are equally adept at totalitarianism. The thing about the post was it treated socialism as just one thing;– The old socialist movements of the left. Nationalistic socialism, or entities like the White Peoples Socialist Party (or the Nazi’s!), things not of the left, are instead assumed to be of the left. The corporatism endemic to fascism, or socialism for corporations (corporate/government collusion), something we seemed to be hedging to in the last 8 years, is not THE SOCIALISM the right wing is always shouting about. I think they are deaf to their kinds by all the chanting they do over this, only liberals make bad, presumption.

The same word in something does not make it exactly the same thing in quality, quantity or necessarily effect, nor many other characteristics, only some aspect. All trees are not exactly alike to our human uses. An apple tree gives me an apple to eat, while a redwood tree holds up many an old California house. The tree part is consistent in its aspect, but what each kind does in use is entirely different depending on human intentions. In that, they are not at all exactly the same thing. I know; Duh.

The extreme naiveté with some on the right continues to amaze me. It does allow for an abstracted purity of mistaken belief. Often, just a word or phrase makes things alike, talking points go out to sponge-abled minds. Before we know it, whole ripe fields are waving in the breeze. Newly found truths of enlightenment are being dispensed for the sleeping masses to wake up to. And all from the blurring of an abstract essence of a thing not truly or truthfully matched up with reality… And something stuffed with straw guides possible idea consumers away. Most of use are benefiting from some kind of relative socialism or other.

-

Oh. I can see why things like science and being really accurate in ones descriptions is so distasteful on the Fixed News and views circuit, which seems the source or instigation of many of these revealed truths. If a scarecrow is thought to scare away desire with its real looking menace, desire may be kept from knowing the truth. That may well be the intention.

The standard corporate model of responsibility and accountability to society is a perfect match for the definition of a psychopath for a reason;– avoiding accountability to The Commons of Life. In other words; Individuals are setting up full intention to preserve getting away with something at others expense. (A documentary segment on Youtube at post bottom) Corporations, lets say on pollution injury, or global warming as examples, have indeed acted as a psychotic would; Believing fully that they are entitled and have a right to do what they do without consequence, then be free to be left alone. So keep government regulation out of my business. Cognitive dissonance assuaging rationalizations (and political) often in the name of abstractions such as freedom and success, help empower this psychosis into patriotic and religious fervor for some.

Now days it seems any government venture of most any kind, except over certain kinds of crime and war, is called looming socialism. Some seem in a near panic over the issue. Government doing anything only government can do; Like stimulate an economy with spending in an emergency; Like taking care of those who fall through the economic and societal cracks (everyday emergencies); Like fix failing infrastructure on a massive scale; Like not letting those who cannot afford it to just stay sick and die, or be driven into poverty.

All this is the slippery slope to the socialism monster. (Odd how if the nation acts in any way like Jesus Christ would, it is considered as some kind of evil. How did what some see as a predominately Christian nation become anti Christ behavior as a whole?) However, in the psychology of the socialist movements on the right; groups ranting over government “give away’s” can end up wanting to give away the government–to themselves.

Just one of the ways those set up as Conservative wannabe’s get fooled by language and reality.

How about this since it seems true:

————The New Corporate Socialism Manifesto————

To Each According to Their Investments

To Those Who Cannot Invest; Serve The Above

Otherwise Get Out of Our Way

This is to be the sole nature of Freedom?

{Wait a Minute! Do not stock dividends and even insurance policies actually redistribute The Wealth?}

-

I link here to another blog that defines Socialism for the Wealthy, as encouraged by George W Bush.

Socialism for the Wealthy: Bush Economics

-

-

Faces of Right Wing Extremism – Google Books Result

by Kathy Marks, Adolfo Caso – 1996 – Political Science – 238 pages
NATIONAL SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA Frank Collins was National Socialist White People’s Party midwest coordinator until he was dismissed by Matt Koehl.

-

In The Name of Profit

-

The Spy by Your Side

Harry Lewis, co-author of the book, “Blown To Bits”, described the existence of software that can be installed into your cell phone without your knowledge. This secret ear leaves your phone broadcasting to authorities while you think it is turned off. Evidently, according to the author, this evidence has already been used in court cases. “Big Brother”, rightly or wrongly, may be listening in to anyone where a court order has allowed it.

I have heard of two instances from friends, where someones cell phone dialed out accidentally. One instance, a mother heard her son walking through the snow to work early in the AM. Footsteps crunching snow. She continues to save the incident. Another instance had potential repercussions when the cell phone decided to dial home to reveal the wearer at a bar. I do not know if any other questionable info occurred to cause relationship trouble.

.

So if you are doing something the court may be interested in, this is your opportunity to sing and perhaps be recommended to American Idol. Make use of your sorry situation. And if your TV is actually watching you, dancing may also provide entertainment.

Now if only we an get some religious group to create a theocratic state so they can tell if we are worshiping properly.  Can’t wait.

Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital

Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, Harry Lewis, “Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty,

Reed Hundt, former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

-

-

-

NOVEMBER FOURTH: A DAY THAT CHANGED THE WORLD

A NEW DAY DAWNS IN BLACK AND WHITE AMERICA

The Chicago experience has produced a president elect of unprecedented proportions. The world is watching.

{Here is a little history of mine involving my perceptions on race relations. Followed by the November 4th election event.}

I was born in Chicago over 1/20th of a millennium ago. I grew up in an all white town a few miles away. In a neighboring town that bordered Chicago, in the 1950-60′s, you could see all white people on “our” side of the street, and all black people on the other. Crowds of both seemingly separate but equal. As a child I wondered, how did we all manage the separation so unanimously?

That situation had changed by 30 years ago. The neighboring suburb then had affluent blacks moving along with all of us other Americans in stores and elsewhere.

With many family deaths and a remaining parent’s suicide, I left Chicago for good before I was an adult. I have always kept a home town interest in the Chicagoland area, and occasionally visit.

After leaving Chicago, a couple years later, I was the only white guy living in a black neighborhood in another state. I thought I was enlightened, accepting all humans as my equal. I lived, in my perceptions, as free to be immersed into a world where race did not matter. I could deal with what blacks would feel towards me because of my color and its presumed entitlements.

I could not fairly judge negative response to me “because” I was white. I felt I could never quite comprehend an other’s bias toward me based on appearances. I did not like being in someones mind as “one of those…” merely by being a physical symbol, but I could not force anyone to change their view no matter how wrong I thought they were. This was a spiritual mission of mine my entire life; to not accept tribalism separations as inalienable facts of truth. It also included my perspective on men and woman.

-

Many years earlier, as a child, I had one of my first experiences with racial antagonism, when as we kids were at one of our rare outings to the local forest preserves, Maple Lake, busloads of all black kids from a church outing or somewhere, passed us by while we were walking around, angrily shouting “white trash” and waving fist and spitting. I had no idea what I had personally done to cause folks my age to be so mad at me.

Now some 13 years later, and living in a black neighborhood, I felt I had every right to live where I want, just as any black or anyone else should live where they want to, in an actually free country. That view has a certain naiveté as far as history is concerned, but such ideas are the promise of hope and law in America.

I bring my history up for what happened in the election of 1976, when Carter won, many blacks were for him. In discussions with black friends I was taken aback, when president Carter would be referred to me as “your president”. I felt; Well what can I do with that kind of view? It was perhaps my most personal sense of rejection by race that I had had. Much more than being called names or whatever. Some fundamental perception had these blacks I knew feel the country was for whites and not for them.

I thought, like it or not, the president is the president. He was not my president because we are both white, while not being yours due to your view on appearance and history. Seemed a canyon like separation of identity. Of course, I was on the side of American history that did not have an ingrained sense of being used and horrifically abused to others benefit due to my color. The bit of some Native American in me, and the larger part Italian/French, did not occur to me as not being assimilated. Yet in my own life I have had people ask me of my name and say; “What kind of a name is that anyway. Doesn’t sound American.”

-

BREAKTHROUGH

-

2008′s 80,000,000 million cracks through the glass ceiling.

I saw a young black guy on TV last night. For a moment, the camera was on him gazing ahead and shaking his head, at the huge Obama victory rally in Chicago’s Grant Park. You could tell, as far as that is possible, that he was trying to process the profound nature of the moment. He seemed to look around at all the mix of people and said; (reading lips) Holy s***!. He appeared to be having an epiphany over the reality that had come into being. For many, everything is different now. It took awhile, and now the ball is in the rest of Americas court; Do we embrace what this nation really is, or go around, no matter how cordial in our differences, thinking someone who looks a bit different than us is not “ours”?

Believe it or not, America is an idea meant to smash tribalism and assert the rights of all.

I could not sleep last night. History kept going through my mind. Every black person I had known, and all the ones out of view of this moment, who never knew what this country was capable of. Last night their candles flickered and burnt out, the sun then rose up upon a new dawn of civilization. One whose light only magnifies with what we overcome within ourselves. We stand now surprised at this mountain top and the view, yet remembering its dream was born of hope and faith in what we each can learn from our differences, instead of turning away.

-

I live in a different minority area now, where my “kind” are about 8% of the population. I seldom see any black people, but when I do? I feel more at home. I lived with black folks, and know some of what many of my “kind” never quite see. But I think quite a few of our young people are getting there or are way ahead of me. Many of my age and older have lived by many stereotypes.  These vanish when living within a Black community.  I could say from my experience, whole veils of misinterpretation are lifted.

Blacks are an extraordinary people, as we all are. Blacks make up 70% of human genetic diversity, as last I heard. Likely, back far enough, we all are kin. But given my current circumstances, often when so rarely surrounded by blacks, it feels to me like a long drought is over. As if some vital part of being human is a bit more known.  Of course this is derived in part from my own history.

I had tears last night, thinking that one day, (and it may be that way for many already, especially in places like the military, where blacks may come to miss something precious from we other folk,) things we seem never able to say out in the open, are opened up inside of us. For now, Barack Obama’s election may seem to some like the day and the dawn for one minority group, or some particular Americans achievement. But the promise of this moment is within each of us regardless of color or background. That is the new measure of Barack Obama’s win and the American experience.
-

NOV 4 2008

Chicago may be losing the Obama’s to Washington and the world, but in its own way, Chicago may take a more prominent place on the world stage.

In this moment in time, Chicago became a place on earth, second to none.

McCain and Obama Debate

REFLECTIONS ON OBAMA VS MCCAIN IN FIRST DEBATE

It is a study in perception and expectation to hear what the debate “seemed” to those who watched it.

I read a bit on one of those often silly fluff pieces put up on the WordPress home page, being stunned that someone turned their sound off and examined how people “looked”.

If we think there are qualifications for the president, one can almost wish there were some for citizens. Do we know the difference from style and substance? Do we know the dangers of getting any more of those 18th century fantasy land “Originalist” on the Supreme Court, in a time when corporations are considered superior to the individual? Unlike back in the Old Day’s, when one of its champions, Clarence Thomas, would now be carrying wood instead of judicial briefs if his fantasy land imaginations were realities. Or are we just looking for style and who seems to score points even if they are false premises or contexts?  Short attention span theater favours ad hominem scoring over truth.

I’m afraid many of us do not realize the bias our corporate individual paradigm holds we regular original people under. We are secondary citizens, from access to government, to responsibility and accountability to the Commons. Many of us here in the good old USA are test-tube citizens, unable to discern the nose on our own face from the one on the TV that seems more, well, real.

MY IMPRESSIONS

I thought the debate was about even, a solid slight Obama advantage, a larger one if one bases their opinions on the use of actual facts and more than might makes right. That is the big invisible creature existing between what is coming across and what the viewer accepts as relevant or even valid. If a certain contemptuous sure style is thought of as strength (a la Cheney) then McCain seemed more certain of his accurate or not absolute conservative buzz notions. If sticking to talking points and phrases are “strong”, then he may have seemed to be more of it. No thinking on ones feet being required, is not a strength to me.

I was glad to see Obama at least look at the person he was talking to at times. That seems one of those fundamental connections that should not be considered voluntary when it comes to governing a nation in a complex world. We’ve had way to much of that ignore your non identical viewpoints already. It was a bit disconcerting to have McCain always looking at the notes of his apparently somewhat scripted presentation. Since he did not read the recent economic two and one half page proposition by the administration days after being submitted, what else will he not bother with once we are not looking. That is scary. Too busy with his lifelong dream of sitting in the oval office? Oligarchical families such as his tend to have grand entitlement expectations, like the Bush’s and Kennedy’s.

I’m glad Obama was not afraid to credit McCain when McCain was right. McCain seemed disabled to go to that factual reality complement. His script was that usual conservative one; lots of false fronts as diversions form real underlying issues. His use of that maverick tag seems intended to excuse those few times he goes off on his own, but after the last convulsive weeks of his campaign, I’m beginning to wonder if being a “maverick” is just another cover for being uniformed, but stubborn enough not to accept anyone else’s ideas.

MY CHRYSTAL BALL

Obama has proved himself to be one steady character, especially next to the erratic McCain lead up to this event. That is now McCain’s challenge. He has to keep his temper and contempt under control. If focus groups determine his ignoring his opponent is not a good thing, he may suddenly seem all “I’m in your face”, come next meeting. This credit could then be chalked up to maverick unpredictability’s.

McCain may well go more towards his warm and fuzzy people stuff. It has been part of the reason he is so accepted in alternative and more youthful areas such as the Daily Show. That, and how he was once a kind of real maverick, refreshing in a cult party of conformity. This sort of TV congeniality is what seemed to help George Bush amongst those who have not much of an ideological clue as to what these degenerating two parties represent, beyond personality type casting.

I would not have let George Bush watch my house over a weekend, not now, or in 2000.  I can see he is a scammer and playing off of American vulnerabilities in perception.  Yet many Americans were ready and eager to trust him.  Thanks a lot.  Now I am feeling these next two in that party have no right to oversee even a small business.  But failure never stopped these conservatives from failing again, even while allegedly succeeding.  The current scammer and chief is one prime example.  But I digress…

Obama has a more engaging world view. Most conservative types tend to keep their ideological blindfolds on until something rips them off; such as being held prisoner. Then, such as in torture issues, one might go against the stream of the blind following the blind. That is, until blindfolds are required anew.

Why Obama is so adverse to representing progressive ideals clearly, beyond the Iraq war issue and generalized economic ones, is quite possibly his wobbling crutch. Those can be quite populist, with strong emotional identity’s to average Americans. I imagine he does not completely share them, feeling they are a false dichotomy or such. Or he is like that centrist trend in his party, bending the individuals interest to the fate of globalising corporate ideologies.

Unfortunately for America; pandering to the wishy washy middle of the road undecideds, has morphed into the position both parties tend to go for come elections. This tendency may quite possibly be one that only furthers corporate horse race preference over truth in context fact… And so the world slides down the merging slippery slope to the One World Corporation. Once the world is a kind of prison, if there are elections for psychological reasons, perhaps the robots will give us food if we vote for the right one. Probably the smiling one.

————————————————————————-

Love has Eternal Depth

Love; The Soul of Being; A meditation on love and forgiveness

Click to view full size image

.

ENTER NOW

NOW HOLDS THE KEY

TO FREEDOM OR SLAVERY

.

what is holding me back?

a whole universe before us

but what persist inside?

is it what I missed?

times I waited

but seemed ignored?

.

this next moment

can be tarred and feathered

by hurt feelings left in memories

leaving now seemingly somewhere else

the next moment can turn another way

remind of what was good

is good now still

though tender and old

and out facing into autumn

.

I

we are all

I

just one I

we make thought quilts

ideas that blanket the world

.

all human doings appear

with what I insist exist

where I chose to look

what I say moves

on from one I

to another

.

but just I

always just

you and I

are always this I

all that decides now

what continues on

what is stopped

forgotten or lost

feared or loved

just I now

and your I

accept

or reject

life

.

history

with its lust for cause

with all its endless repetition

where cause can be confused

who started what is veiled

automatic darkness

beneath loves sun

until just one I

changes course

.

this barrier each I faces

do we play the old storyline

follow well worn plot pathways

that still are surrounded in wonder

but we stay on the bare trampled soil

cleared and near sterile temptation

walking ahead into history

what is stopping us ever

from truly moving forward

when one easy step

into freedom?

.

Just these I’s

that is all

for history is done

no matter the horror

or wrong doings

these we command

if I take loves course

they can be forgiven now

a door opened into love

this your freedoms proof

this thing I can do

and you

.

those who say no to I AM

no to forward and forgiveness

no to growing up and into love

these are the bankers of fear

seeking comfort in theft’s company

as they seek to sell souls into doubt

that which seems so easy to prove

over and over until it becomes

the vision they walk towards

a realm of love lost

backwardly

.

unlike hate and fear

love takes true courage

love takes being present

love takes standing up tall

bravely opening wide up

giving in to heroic calm

to the most loving thing

.

deep waters of everything

anchored to Creations Center

where all things are real

each hand held to eternity

setting a heart free

to feel each heart

such a chore

.

we but need to dare

look our escapes in the face

we are stronger now than ever

undaunted by judgements

recognising the error

in orientation

.

then behold

finding I AM

beginning and end

one point real power lives

giving us Its gift

right now

here

.

the powerful

are those who love

those who love it all as is

including the poignancy of loss

including wandering in the desert

including the pains and forgetfulness

that makes finding even more majestic

.

what is stopping your next intent

what question rules as overlord

but more importantly

who am I

without love

to say it is gone

and too hard

to be?

.

I as us

you and me

do we think this is

too Utopian and easy?

too obvious to be true for

surely we should have seen it?

too impossible to coordinate

with all other sojourner I’s?

.

just one moment now

just one I in time’s crest

where every moment is loved

only this one place to change

right now were I stand or fall

only one person to decide

what I will be now

be opened up to love

or look for ways to close union off

making it distant and difficult

for then I am far away

from where I belong

a lone star

outside the Milky Way

.

this inside of light

behind my closed eyes

an inner truth still shines

though I may not look out

to see its caressing colors

illuminating my world

and what I am

it is easy to miss

the most obvious

when not attending

.

so very simple

completely universal

problem and conflict traditions

gone in a blink and an I

gone right now

not into hiding

but into seeing our depth

we each hold our true birthright

taking the stolen strength in heart

from each fossilized mistake

.

come to realize

how these become extinct

each and every time I create one

that is the power of consciousness

of I instead of what I do not know

or try to be from lacking

ever wandering seeking

missing what is receiving

.

here the power of love

healing even amidst loss

strong enough to overcome

what fear and darkness bring

that light inside is eternal

known when I enter

where I am

Love

all the love

denied

all the love

waited for

all

right here

known by offering

even when receiving

the gift that comes

from giving

Love

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

{The most fierce things show a moment of loves obvious presence}

.

.

.

.

image at very top courtesy of

CLOUDS FADE AWAY; a short life reflection while moon walking

(Well short as far as a life is concerned)

Planes flew over my house as a kid. They roared in on their way to Midway Airport. My father had flown in World War Two, actually shooting other guys down, but to me, those up in the sky perspectives were unfathomable memories. I had nothing to look to but my imagination of flight. I would never fly. That was for people with money, much more than we or I would ever seem to have. And then they crash, just miles away, into homes and children. Planes seemed like a risk, a haunting you would have to release to get on board one.

But I would day dream and seem to float up between towering cumulus clouds. Then there were the cumulonimbus. I knew they would seem more dangerous with lightning and all. How would the air be around those cauliflower sculptures and anvil scratched heaven? Tens of thousands of feet high, and you could still see them bubble up. How would I stay just ahead, flying kinda like superman? Could I safely touch the growing edge?

Then came the space flights, the landing on the moon. You had to be there. No, not on the moon, but in front of the TV, there in space, then later on the moon. By the moon landings I was just a teenager, but I knew from school, and watching the planes come over to and from Midway, that dreams were coming in fast. It seemed that when we, we humans, set our minds on a goal, we can reel it in. It was us, and not just those few actually leaving footprints in cosmic dust.

With my parents long dead by then, I had no path apparent to dream fulfillment. I was crushed by my school experience and its seeming smothering of the free human spirit. I had these dreams of possibility as all that kept me going, that I would survive to be present for where I fit in. Serious dental issues kept me out of any public eye, including most friends. Nights were often times of throbbing pain and next to no sleep. My hand covered my mouth to keep others from seeing cavities and missing teeth, but it seemed to eventually stop my words as well. I too, seemed to be blocking my way into the future.

Yet there was what could be, and could become of me. I worked at times 36 hours straight in below freezing (usually below 0) weather on an open truck dock at the airport, only to have my whole check taken by the guardian. I rode the bike since she gave my car to a son of hers (she consigned, I had already paid it off). Then from work, I take my broken (1 pedal) bike on its 25 mile trip to community college. Once I walked the ten miles home on Sunday early AM after work with an arm load of books, no hat or gloves, over frozen slush in a windy 9 degree night–7hrs. What dreams I had, were had with the longest kitchen knife under my pillow, in case a death threat was carried out. I wanted at least that advantage.

=

I suspect this kind of story is not unheard of in America, but one thing is clear, conservatives do nothing about it, but list platitudes and parade around to abstractions in their detached from the whole, psychic illness. Values voters indeed. They actually vote from a hidden shame, which needs releasing just as fear of flying does. That is, if one actually is for engaging the interest of all life. The present moment tells a tale of all that is, yet for some, their security is all that matters.

-

{I often critique conservatism because it applies an unchecked bias to the present moment, to now. I am for learning from history, as well as preserving much of the earths viable cultural traditions that do not force their bias onto now. Why come down on an ideological perspective then? The present moment is where the matrices of existence, not only interact, but adapt. Conservatism tends to actually oppose Creations ongoing truthful manifestation right now, and what it takes as being a apart of it, to comprehend what we can, in a constantly adapting environment.

That avoidance to change constitutes a disservice to knowing and being present in our entirety. It results in inevitable decay. Why I call conservatism, as it is now promoted in the economic and sociopolitical realms; The Dry Rot of Civilization. Not to be mean or talking down to others, but to express a warning of a reactionary ideological prejudice that threatens life as we know it. For conservatives, many of them, need no reality check, nor take anything contravening into their equations of judgement.


To discover this bias for oneself, just listen to conservatism lack of self observation and perspective, its truncating of context to suit self promoting abstraction, as well as an endless supply of “fire wall” denigrations attached to those who say change is a necessity, that the ills of society and the environment require more than denial of responsibility, or otherwise punishment for those who do not fit into conservatism’s applied world view.

It is why on 9-11-01 , to avoid any looking into US historical actions in the regions from the Mideast to Afghanistan, it was said; “There is nothing to understand!” . Searching for the very Truth itself was deemed being on the “them’s” terror side. Yet then, “we” side with the darkness of ignorance and reaction incarnate. We naturally, then, spiral down the dark alleys of deception and denial, with a self hit list of high minded abstract platitudes as cover for our violation of now.

For also at 9-11-01, was a worldwide union sensed, with its outpouring of love to the US, and the will to be marshaled to address the very context that sustains these other aberrant conservatives of another culture, who are manipulated down their own dark alleys, to consider innocence non existent in others, and something worth denying in Gods name. Instead of understanding, the power’s that be sought their own “security” promoting ignorance and misconception over factual realities.

Since the universe does not sustain deception indefinitely, just as dry rotted wood can look sound, but have deception lurking right below the surface. Conservatism has self destruction built into its very premise, which denies now its intrinsic right to be. Just as blindness is fundamentally its guide, conservatism sustains itself by a seduction to a simplistic interpretation of now, and that attracts a laziness of mind and heart seemingly comfortable, but deadening in its soul. It is separation and alienation based, promoting “us and them’s”. Lending its followers to favor force, imposition and destruction over the courage to love life freely, serving a creatively vibrant and all encompassing Creation.}

-27.11.05 1600x1200 (176.6 KB)

Conservatism’s Curse Of Perspective On Cause And Effect

They become fear based, presenting various wars as the answer to all problems, for they are unable to accommodate true causal solutions, then they would have to be held accountable, by conscience, to their own complicity. So they campaign on projecting accountabilities to society’s ills. Crime ( ex. “war on drugs”) and terror, and other faults alleged of others are used as diversion toward causality, then their seductive glowing generalities and abstractions are posed as cover for their inability to look truth in the eyes. So its substitute, belief, gives them faith through their inherent uncertainty. It is ignorance that becomes the conservatives primary cover.

This one thing is sure; conservatives do not accept responsibility for their actions. They hide behind their wall of so called values and morals as diversions from their own shame of not being truly present now. And so, unlike how liberalism seeks to address issues in context, to effect the substance behind acts, conservatism dissects from the Whole, then targets blame. They are surface based actually, but think the opposite, in their baby blanket like comfort zone of detached from reality abstractions. Those judgements make them unable to accept reality, and so, wish fulfilling fantasies of god-like control are what they have to resort to…

Mind Control Games

Conservatism is at its heart; pretense.  It then requires a manifold approach to diverting objective based critical thinking, by substituting rationalization as true reason.  We can detect this by conservatism use of Thought-terminating clichéd; buzz words and phrased that turn their followers immediately away from considering an issue.  These buzz worded conceptions are often loaded with shame and blame based characterisations, designed to shame and ostracize “The Other”, those you assume are not like you, and not in a good way.

Confirmation Bias

Confirmation Bias is a mainstay of buttressing conservative rationalizations.  Conservative news sources tend to be filled with Circular Reasoning logical loops; where the premise becomes its own proof by assumption and its pre-existing bias.  These confirm an Appearance Reality; how things seem to the logical matrix.  This establishes an ongoing Consensus Reality, where premise is not questioned but believed by a group to be true.  this creates conservatism’s confidence in the minds of its followers, to the extent that things like the global warming driving climate change can be denied, even to the extent of demeaning the Climate Theory as irrelevant.  An astounding denial of what is objectively undeniable human impact upon the planet.

Then comes existential relativism; where conservatism’s bias is projected out to all other fact and theory.  You say the earth is round, I say it is flat and I have proof; just look out your window.  The earth circles the sun you say?  Ridiculous speculation.  I believe my own eyes, ot you theory.  I believe in facts and not theory!  It is that easy!  Conservatism, which we all have likely in our own ways, just as liberalism, can reverse reality by its definition of reality, while liberalism is ostensibly reality based and open to adjustment through understanding.  A common human issue has become externalized into a battle over the turf of the earth and of human minds.

The Consequence

What conservatism has lost at its heart, is how desire and discovery open the pathway to a dream, a dream even as far fetched as reaching to the moon. I stood outside looking at this moon of ours, thinking our flag was there now, seemingly to stay forever in a peculiar motionless sterility, no matter what changes here, oddly like conservatism. It reminded me now of an idea of life which refuses to change. I tried to feel the presence of our beating hearts and open eyes in 1969. Mine looking up at, not just the moon, but the eyes of men on the moon. I was there too in a very basic sense, that the moon was now something that humans could do. A more obvious personal connection to it now that ever before, as if a mystery had been uncovered and potentials for reality set free. Thee is still, as always, the wondrous mystery of being.

=

Yet back just a few years earlier, the TV show “The Honeymooners” main husband character, played by Jackie Gleason, would say; ‘To the moon Alice, too the moon!’ in a teasing horror of a joke. He meant punch her that high, to the moon. It was absurd, for we would never actually get anyone, not even Alice anywhere near the moon for generations. Yet there we were already, and kids like me, we watched every launch. We saw what fire could do, not only consume, but fire you into space. It seemed we would now never look back. The Space Race now belonged to the human race. We were leaving our earth shell behind and emerging as a space faring civilization. This all seemed as immanent as that Honeymooners impossibility becoming true right in our living rooms.

From the movie and the TV screens, science fiction shows projected notions of what we would be doing, logically, even conservatively, as this exponential space exploration blossomed ahead of reality. The show Space 1999, and the movie, 2001, a Space Odyssey, put these soon to be realities where they would safely seem appropriate. We all, more or less, found their speculations, not absurd as “Too the moon Alice!” was, but instead, food for thought. In the 1960′s, with Star Trek on TV, and the on-going Space Race, I figured by the time I was 40, surely there would be individual independent flight. I imagine that we would lift up from or back yards, and be controlled by mechanical intelligence as on Star Trek. I would finally, in a manner of minutes, find myself from the back yard, up at the clouds edge, following my dream.

As it has turned out, we invested in the Space Race, not exactly for all the spin off technological advances that we take for granted today, but to keep ahead of the other guy whom we feared. With enough fear, we as a “free” people, seem to recognize that resources and desire must be pooled into one direction, and not have 10,000 people all reinventing the wheel at the same time. The waste of the laissez faire system would just leave us swimming in a whirlpool, not ever knowing as a people, which way to go right now, under this impulse to achieve. And so as sensible people do under common challenge, we pooled our dreams and creativity with our resources, and made discovery happen.

The story becomes stalled after these dreams evaporated. The arguments became these we are so familiar with. ‘Down with big government. Private initiative does things better. The government is Satan. Drown government in the bathtub. Just say no to taxes’…, but over and over, like a prayer to an absurd privatized god, who does not know better than support only individual dreams, and not those of a society itself. We entered this realm, where the wealthy and powerful tell us to be small and think small, cause we are all in this for ourselves. To think big, you join them. It’s all up to you…

==============================================================

07.02.06 1600x1200 (86.4 KB)

Now away with you. If I do not make money off of you, you are nothing to me, why need I concern myself with your issues, except when I might need a vote come elections? I will create a liberal monster to blame for society’s ills, while every tax cut puts more money, not to keep in your pocket, but my own. With a monster, children huddled under the covers can be fooled of many things. Luckily, religion is instituted on trust and belief. We will easily steer those in this faith based modality, to trust us if we employ their abstraction’s as our own. Who claims to be their monster fighters after all! We will in time morph these into a philosophy, where good is us and bad is them. Since these kinds reality check is up in the air so to speak, critically impaired, this control can be achieved at their own hand.

We will keep common efforts to what I fear, and what I need you to fear. These too will be hammered into consciousness come elections. They will provide might makes right as the desired answer and response to problems I perceive. If I feel threatened enough over other issues, I will then promote them as well, but only if I get a stake in the pyramid schemes income flow afterwards. I cannot abide liberals getting any of this, so we will tag them with both sin and misguided sincerity. If a new portal of democratic news becomes available, I must contain it. This will be done stealthily if need be. (It is being done, in some places liberal sites become inaccessible=censorship of idea)

The beauty of the impersonal-ism of the WEB is, one will not now why someone or some group simply disappears from view. As usual, we will likely use the cover of some “bad” to undo the public will and leave my own. As the Nazis knew, there is no problem in making someone out to be a problem to be eliminated in the public interest. Ah, the beauty of corporatism. Companies will do their own censorship for the benefit of themselves via the corporation, than that of the individual citizen. Once we finally get the individual to be branded by corporate product and thus philosophy, they will “naturally” see things mostly our way. Eventually we will commandeer that more liberal party as well. With superior access to minds across the boards, we can keep the debates turned into the areas we need them to be of our own survival. Submission is just a matter of time now…

=============================================================

Arctic Sea Ice Reaches Lowest Coverage for 2008
09.16.08

Arctic sea ice coverage appears to have reached its lowest extent for the year and the second-lowest amount recorded since the dawn of the satellite era, according to observations from the NASA-supported National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado in Boulder.
Artist concept of Arctic ice

Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio; Blue Marble Next Generation data courtesy Reto Stockli (NASA/GSFC)

=============================================================

And that is some of the way in which we end up with a planet tottering on suicidal competitions global warming catastrophe and extinction event. We are divided against ourselves with an emotionalized “culture war” and demonized “others” opposition, which is really a diversion of public consciousness from what matters to endless opinion mongering, with its ad-hominem truncated reasoning ability. Our political parties now provide the necessary impotence to keep the corporate ideology in charge, while public voting now mostly addresses the damage left in its wake. Finger pointing across the aisles keep the public, who cares that is, enamored with tabloid issues and propaganda hype. This is the actual politics of smoke and mirrors combined with a shell game come elections.

So the young boy who began this article, feels the effects of age and fallen dreams of human possibility. I put these notes into unlikely post bottles. They float to satellites as I thought I would surely be doing by 16 years ago. My childhood imagination then, was inspired by what I had seen. I have seen much since then, how certain political interest, interested in guaranteeing their own superior lifestyles, could and did manipulate the system to become their own system. It was only interested in a dream of self centered achievement, with its illusory dissections from the whole of life. These self achievers dreams, they made them money and that prestige status is in constant lust of. We have all been reduced to both fear, and that other now common denominator of survival. Getting money or doing without, since “losers” need not be thought of humanely.

It has been an odd ride for sure, as the moon swings overhead in silent watch. Dreams cheapened to the profiteering spirit, and not that of knowledge, possibility, creativity and capability in unbreakable continuity of cause. In fundamentally significant respects, we have each been reduced to an us versus all of them, then, when scared to death, told the us is much greater, so do not question destruction.

We in the US now keep our dream seeking lifestyle, thanks not to entrepreneurs exactly, but to the sad individuals situation over much of China. They suffer and sweat for our thus artificially reduced prices, and remaining abilities to buy what we need to survive while pushing the environments past breaking points. Many other nations, called the “third world” (what a delusional separation complex that all is), have likewise, done this slavery for us in the past and present. Those other interest are invisible, but desirable to exist for the rich, whom wealth seems to have divorced love from as far as humanity is concerned. Even in places here in our nation; two adults working minimum wage in one household with a couple kids, can not support the basic necessities for survival. “The basics of the economy are fine”, one delusional conservatives response.

We are being reduced by someone else’s delusional “self made” or silver spooned dreams, that constitute our emerging nightmares and worry. This too, we can thank the separated and isolated from consequence delusional self achievers for, as well as the evaporation of freedom and democracy right before our often closed eyes. This is what today’s conservatism has reduced society to. We are now a culture of immature beings, seemingly kept in a larval state. Amazing to observed the extreme basic childish naiveté of conservatism’s constant whine. It is now as if our eyes are closed for us by the screech, that we not accept nor admit, the consequence of our own actions, and by inference, the consequence of the actions of those whose lives we now live in service to. Humankind is in many ways self deceived into a circus of accusation and blame. the individual, not seemingly required to do much but make sure they have an income to make it.

When flying on commercial jets, I look out at the clouds. And when we must fly through towering cumulus fields, I am that dream of my youth, just slightly stretched. I imagine I am where I once expected, not free exactly, but by necessity. Still it is a privilege for me. Yet now the way it is, even dreams must be questioned for their carbon footprint, even in the clouds or up on earths satellite. We must live consciously, and not lured into anaesthetic living, with antiseptic dreams and an artificial heart. I must discover, what an organic being is on a planet based on living systems, and the requirements for us to live in health in this context. In the end, this choice comes down to one point of self orientation.

I still take photo’s of clouds to this day. They at least remain free, they are right in their place, not being deceived or mislead by other clouds or belief. In this purity of expression, they portray what is. Though they may be turning away, I follow them to the horizon…

If we look to the truth, not the abstraction we argue about, but the reality of Beingness, we find we are all in One Place. There is no true, completely personal perspective, unless it is in immersion with the All that is. I will not quantify that All here with an image based name as if It were an object. It is the Process of Life in reality. The words most near It are Absolute Love. No ifs, ands or act this way first about It. It deserves capital letters simply by being the One and Only real Truth Aspect.

No matter how lost I am in my imagination of how things should be, or I want them to be, It presides over reality. In my wanderings away into doubt or despair, yes, even the aloneness of my own consciousness, It is there with and in me, as in you and all things. We each are a unique quality of It, and where do I see this Divine Union in your expression? We, in effect, all owe that perspective to one another. It is this Essence of Being that I and you and everyone and thing else actually is. Those narratives we carry to blame someone or thing else for how the universe seems to me, those are actually inventions of a distracted being, blaming our drunkenness of imagination on that crooked path we see.

These human problems that plague us, and all our beliefs in conflict, they are the evidence of a lost state, a state where Love is not first and foremost, a state where any number of diversions command the attention of the I that I am. In these things, it is my own choice, a choice of claiming to know more and better than Life Itself. Here is where personal dissonance becomes the very choice of my own orientation in Life, and that price paid is in not knowing unconditional Love.

Whether I look toward that Center that centers us all in the infallibility of pure unconditional Love, or sure of Its apparent absence, go on to rearrange things for myself. Reality, it seems, is a one way street. It becomes my charge when under stress or otherwise, to see which way the light of understanding cast its sights, then chose to go against even my own disgruntled background. Love may actually be the easiest and most rewarding Thing in this world, but It takes personal fortitude to chose It, over righteous indignation. There, the life with Love begins, and cannot be extinguished.

-

.

-

Share

THE HEADLOCK ON LIBERTY–HOW FREEDOM IS USED AGAINST ITSELF

In the political battle over how things look, seem, or otherwise appear, an important aspect of fighting for freedom is being overlooked.

The Equal Rights movement, and Woman’s movement, were not waged by conservatives. It was liberals who had to fight, endure ridicule, be considered malcontents and worse, in their battles against conservative traditionalism, to make freedom and liberty more available to those previously kept off of powers radar. It is often ironic but not surprising, that so often it is conservatism that rides off the suffering of liberalism to reap the benefit.

I had long expected that the first black and or first woman presidential candidate would come on the conservative ticket. The latest example of this phenomenon was Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel. We must remember Geraldine Ferraro’s actual rise, thanks directly to the woman’s movement, to be a vice presidential candidate, yet I am speaking of the advantage conservatives take after the expense of the liberal movements.

Stunningly, Margaret Thatcher, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979-1990), all but declared the commons, or broad community interest, a figment of imagination. She believed that freedom was best protected by individualism, because it would resist governmental tyranny. That wishful thinking ignores the interconnectedness of life and lives, but suggest individualist such as Hitler, are liberty’s protectorate. It is a study in contradiction, to see these who benefit from fights for liberty, turn around and stab them in the back in their remaining struggles. That is the nature of ideological poisoning, once the circular logic matrix’s are connected up, nothing else, not even facts or statistics, can stand in the way of head nodding assumption.

UNCOMMONS SENSE

This is the nature of exploitation strategies, in the modern world, they need to brand their name to the public identity, so I think they are saying they will do nice things for my interest. Best to appropriate, through the media, what I think those are. If liberalism shows a strength, undermine it by using it against it. A block is necessary to create the proper wedge; liberals claim to be for quality of all life, then attach them to “wanting” abortion.

Now the actual complexities on the ground of a woman or girl can be disregarded for a pure abstraction. Nothing like abstractions to motivate the conservative mind once it has received its negative and positive charge. No hard fought battle needed. No arguing for acceptance and plausibility required, in fact, keep all countervailing realities and ambiguities out of purities profound sense of correctness. Ah!  That clear promised land of abstraction.

Purity is achieved in a simple abstract concept, tagged to the image of authority that then is assumed to ony belong to their viewpoint. It is no coincidence that Rovian psychology is to induce doubt into the oppositions strength, then provide some hero on a Trojan white Horse of abstraction to rescue the new existentially stranded, and all thanks to the now fundamentally ignored but still to blame liberal hard work in opening doors.

Seems once liberty opens a new door, there is no guarantee as to what will walk through it. This becomes an exercise in contortion, where liberty’s head is forced to begin to consume its tail. And so the commons, the great connectivity between all things that actually sustains us, is greedily divided up and falsely “conquered” through rampant unchecked individualism (now often in corporate dress).

This achievement made emotionally easy by men and women who have no divine power or authority to know what their knives of separation, sever and destroy, nor awareness apparently, of the consequence or responsibility of their action. Yet away from the mess, and in denial of its creation, this supposedly meritorious individualism pads the self serving delusional ego’s enticed into its self validating rationalizations with the most grand abstraction influence pedaling can conjure. Nothing flatters like what seems a success.

The oft denied global warming is just one of the many examples of how contempt for the commons comes back to haunt conservatives, liberals and everyone else alike. It is the return response from the immutable commons that exist beyond self righteous individualistic identity. Only the liberals knew, or had the courage or honesty to admit, something man induced was going on in truth ahead of time.

This does not stop the consumerism propaganda locomotives machinery that has a magical assumption that all issues will be addressed in time, but it does not know when that time is.  We assume problems, perhaps fatal ones, will be addressed in time by the market, with something else to sell.  Magical assumption just requires an oversight zeitgeist that suggest that behaviors need not necessarily change, but humankind’s innovative spirit will come to the rescue. We race materialism on a speeding train towards a chasm with no bridge, and what is the success response as defined by materialism?; to throw more oil into the engine.

In this, that conservative brand must exercise into constant denial and pointing program, and somehow, someway, make it seem as it was all the fault of liberals actually, as we move from the once upon a time coast to the soon to be inland shore. In fact, the conservatives will look for a way to profit greatly off of this ongoing disaster in the making. It seems the exploitation of opportunistic advantage, is a way of life to some.  They may claim we are mistaken and actually owe them, but no matter what they say, we will pay a price beyond our pocketbooks. We will pay with a planets life.

Oh yeah, I have a usual rote answer; Naysayer. Why are you against success and happiness?

GOD is in the Details

William Blake said; “To see a World in a Grain of Sand And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour.”

Someone else said; “The Devil is in the Details.” These statements are in ways talking of the same small things, the small things around us and what they come to mean. One implies deep indwelling awe-inspiring wonder, and the other one, a kind of frustration over details that are a kind of damnation.

Clearly what is being seen is quite, if not entirely, dependent upon the observer. For human awareness, the details seem in both statements, to represent some profound change in focusing in on the dimensions of the specific in the context of human awareness of reality coming to expectations. Existence seems to meet with need inside us, with our beliefs and expectations having to be in some way humbled to what is. Whatever this what is, is, It has a command over what will be. We may be fascinated by its very manifestation’s before us, or find it as some kind of imposing barrier to our fantasies wish fulfillment.

It is an old adage that the devil is in the details. Usually this is designed to infer how great ideas, or even hopeful fantasies, can meet their “fall” in the minutiae that brings reality, and perhaps tedious practicalities, to the table of creation. We may will things to be, but whether they can or are even allowed to be is another matter that can come to frustrate those details ad-infinitum.

What we expect or demand from life can create friction in being, that implies, not necessarily a disturbance in the outside world, but more likely, problems in our conceptual appreciations of what is and what can be. “Clever” self interest can manipulate these discrepancies in others consciousness by argument or cultural imposition. We can see trouble in our hopes and dreams being caused by someone else, which may have some reality, and may also be used as a ploy to manipulate our own hopes and expectations of the future, actually counting on our dissatisfaction’s in life.

IGNORANCE CARIES ITS OWN RISK, AND FOR SOME, REWARDS

It does seem prudent, if not wise, to condition ones expectations of the future in some respects. That does not mean, however, to stop trying to achieve ones dreams; conditions may change in time, the universe seemingly becoming more congenial to ones imagination. More likely, it will be we who adjust our dreams to be more in accordance with reality, or note the occasion when the idea “fit’s” better. We must be in harmony in some fundamental way to have meaningful dreams gain a lasting foothold in the real world.

That does not mean all ideas that are implemented are good ones, or for the good of all. It does not follow, that all imaginings made into reality are actually in harmony with the universe, but merely that there is often a space to “get away with” some endeavors, before a deeper truth intervenes in time to crop the creation. Many a mad man or woman have had dramatic impacts on history (for a time being) in a grossly negative or unfavorable way for the rest of humanity. Thankfully the the positive ones have a certain persistence. Hope for using this relative ignorance of reality for political and self supporting ends, does seem to spring eternal. Most political interest are fashioned around maintaining relative ignorance for advantage.

Democracy, and its relative freedoms and responsibilities for citizens, is an institution designed to have the most input possible in choosing how a nation evolves in time. It implies a fair playing field as well as unfettered access by the public to all information relevant to choosing both candidates and which issues are most relevant. These attempts at giving all a say are being changed in profound and contradictory ways. In the culture, money has become the defining vehicle for access to influence in the culture, to the extent that information conduits, the media (Fourth Estate), is to some measure held under the inebriated thought processes of wealth.

YEA I’M FOR THAT –if you mean this by that!

Freedom and equality are now defined as abstract qualities that are themselves at this mercy of wealth and power. Then, the once empowered individual in the democracy, a land of implied inherent equality through the voting process, has had the heart removed from their true ability to guide governmental institutions. The dollar put into its place, to be now worshiped as the source of life and giving in the basic paradigms for individual survival strategies.

We are witnessing the pulling of the rug from under the very concept of the Commons, with its implied broad relationship to all things. Through the rendering of abstractions into situational relativity, then the assaults on the Whole of Life, as being something somehow only entitled to those with money. Much of these individual grand gains are at the expense of taking from the commons and assembling that hoarding into individual fiefdoms. Most any once held sacred quality (from Freedom to God) can now be relegated to only being deserving to those who support and defend status quo hierarchical inventions.

This is part of how the Enlightenment is being undone under the stealthy disguise of the modern worlds materialist manifesto, the cancerous philosophy that more and bigger is always better. Money is the abstract yet tangible proof that access to the things of life flow “naturally” to those who have the most to spend.

A TIME UNDER THE SUN

We survive as a species, with our various freedoms and influence individually, because to a large degree, aberrant consciousness and predatory will ends up being self consumed by those ever-present details. When that “push comes to shove” especially over conflicting issues that seem patently unfair and oppressive-exploitative, humankind has stood up en mass for a new paradigm of social order; one where average and random individuals are guaranteed basic rights and a voice in how humankind chooses to operate on earth.

The Golden Rule and Categorical Imperative, are conceptual forms of these common sense fundamental conscious paradigms that define the individuals recognition, not ony of others like oneself as human beings, but the Wholeness of the Commons, where all things are recognised as interrelating and being interconnected. That “getting away with something” is left as a self delusion for the alienate and separation obsessed.

When humanity ceases to override predator behavior on the collective, the commons, our common ground, in other words; We the People, and no longer curbs megalomaniacs and misanthropy, we will vanish as a life form, taking all dreams, good and bad and otherwise with us. Many may doubt such a statement by looking at gross disadvantages and the pressure brought upon the environments by a small class of people who intend to “do what they want” regardless of others, being tat the earth is in apparent crisis.

CHOOSING SURVIVAL AT DEEPER LEVELS THAN THE SURFACE WOULD SEEM TO INDICATE

This phenomenon of natural selection is dependent on both genetic, environmental, and for us, psycho-spiritual evolution. What goes on in the human mind does matter. Consciousness is not outside the proving grounds of reality’s truth forever, as fantasy’s might suggest. As in genetic mutation, some concepts are useful and some can be harmful.

I believe in things I do not truly know, but pretend to. I also intuit things that are proved later to be true, but I do not know how, or maybe even why. I can be completely confident in subjects I truthfully have superficial actual knowledge about, perhaps blending both intuition and scientific like evidence, that together lean me to say yes to something as truly being. I can be most defensive of things as being true which I have emotional investments in but little actual and factual reality checking. We have much identity invested in the “hedge funds” of the mind.

If genetics could “see” intervening interrelationships, as the human mind is slightly capable of, including those details that make or break inevitable changes inside or outside of an organism, it would have more of a “heads up” than it has seemed with so called random mutation. Now in a manner of speaking, what we are does have limited sight into genetics, evolution (the Creation behind it) does have obvious eyes to see very close to us (ours).

We may chose to see life as limited to our concept of genetic and conventional evolutionary theory, and try to repress transcendental experience. Love, belonging , purpose and such might be said to be actually only chemicals creating illusion. We can also see life as a process of Being so grand in scale and intricacy, that we would never assume only the mind would process all of reality and give us a true full comprehension of what actually is the Living Truth.

In the timelessness of being, evolution as we currently define and understand it, has proved to be perfectly efficient at creating a self aware lifeform that is capable of this limited heads up, or foresight in what follows from action. In that perspective, life has come to know what it is doing, or is at least capable of some measure of that awareness. We have a relationships that preserves collective awareness by culture–language, stories, music, books, etc, that allow us to even question ourselves and the assumptions we impose on reality.

The good news is, only we inhibit our abilities to comprehend this new insight into being represented by our collective/cultural sentient reflective and behavioral abilities. In our western individualized sense of self, we have been “liberated” to believe anything we want, and more or less have no one tell us we are wrong. We may not realize that by assuming any old thing we want can be true if we decide to insist it is so, being entitled to our opinions and all, we may actually resent having to hold our decisions to any accounting.

This is a good “set up” to conceal many things, not actually true, under a rug of misdirrection for quite some time, all the while, apparently not having any real repercussions from the universe by going against its flow. We then can assume we are right, while looking at others, see negative to us repercussions, then insist they are wrong. Anyone who tries to conceal the dubious details with preemptive ad hominem emotional attack, are on the defensive to stop critical thinking from unveiling the actual truth of the matter to group consciousness.

THE GREY AREA OF GREY MATTER

In my simple description, it is possible to see that deception and truth can coexist and not be known to be contrary. We can have an idea that in effect is a mutant variant that is destined to fail, yet we have space to believe it is both true and of great use, fitting our apparent needs. Apparent is a key word; many an apparent useful invention, be it mechanical or ideological, can have in its “genes” the path to self destruction.

Ideas and inventions can seem of great use if they seem to benefit us, especially benefiting us a lot, like slavery does (and did) to those who siphon off other human beings energy for themselves. Slavery can achieve great things, and appear to be the right way to be, until social-environmental “blowback” occurs, as it surely will in self predatory endeavors.

The modern world has many slavery like usurpation of others energy schemes imposed upon masses of people. Many of these are systemically sanctioned as essential economic endeavors that are assumed to be positive and so bestowing their persona benefactors with royal like treatment, all while disguising many negative reactions from the planet. Ideology and propaganda are used to cover the slavery and risk motivations, giving them distinguished air’s to assuage hidden guilt over predation.

These cognitive dissonant like Trojan Horses of systematic predation are inculcated into acceptance starting at birth, being rolled into the commons as symbols of the individuals resurrection. They are separation-ego based, depending on a lack of empathy and compassion in their adherents towards any negative impacts on the environment and other human beings. Much status quo resentment is directed towards any who claim to notice these Trojan Horses of exploitation brought through the gates of the culture. The modern world is notable for its cancer like exploitation of the survival ecosystem, and god like enthronements of materialism and property splendor accumulated to the self sacred golden calves. Notice how global warming and pollution, potentially terminal illnesses, are denied the longest by those who create them the most.

I CHOSE NOT TO SEE WHAT YOU SAY, SO IT IS NOT A FACTOR FOR ME NOW

The modern world is now faced with its own worst enemy; itself. The lack of Whole or integrated perspective endemic to exploitative cults, existentializes the society. We claim a pluralistic universal principle, yet seem to pursue individual gain, conditioning the principle to our own self centered benefit. A problematic scheme exist that has the effect of putting both individual advantage and religious advantage at odds with those who claim to be somehow under siege by the structures of society and culture, that seem to prevent or at least greatly inhibit their own self realization.

Self realization is held hostage to the social order constructs present across societies infrastructures and societal perspective on what constitutes a full and realized responsible individual. In effect, while much talk of freedom and pluralism is claimed as existing across the land, rigged behavioral and other walled in avenues for true self realization are in place to dictate the actual parameters of societies definition of the wholesome self. These include near blind submission to caste systems existing within now pseudo-democracy’s. Attitudinal and emotional condemnation of those who seek to go their own way, even if not hurting others, is encouraged when that own way challenges the pyramidal schemes instituted throughout society to preserve the entrenched interest of the “haves” over the “have” not as much by fars.

If the earth is anything, it is the cosmic egg that shows how life’s fertility will overcome predation and catastrophe, irregardless of the timescales involved. The energy of the sun and the matter of earth, condense interrelationship and distill themselves into an ongoing structure supporting the ever increasing diversity of life. The challenges of the universe, with their unexpected intrusions, have only increased the varieties of living organisms. We can assume that something of this refusal to be undone forever is basic to humankind, and part of that driving force that we abstract from what life is Itself. We are cast into a role now, of being the guardians of life as we know it.

PROOF AND LET ME THINK ABOUT IT:

Knowing, faith, belief and truth are called real, but are they?

What science and religion have done, is attempt to define the parameters of being and the rule of law being functions under. These apparent truths can be taken into various seemingly contradictory or paradoxical assumptions. They can then, with their implied unknowns to individuals, go on to seem as a blessing or a curse depending on ones point of view.

Today we have both these sorts of “opposing” views on universal order co-mingled, yet at times not recognized as such. Attempts, both conscious and unconscious, to define these two being interpretations as hostile to one another has gained much footing in the public sphere, yet the reality of their actual divisions can be highly obscured by economic and political manipulations running under their radars.

One of these traditions claims that only repetitive test and results can prove a relative truth, while the other assumes that absolute truth is known and quantified, often by subjective assumption and presumption originating in prior teachings that are essentially unquestionable. The former, science, tends to believe it is inherently objective, since it can reproduce its evidence of real fact, and then claim a theory of that facts relationship as a true cause.

The latter tradition, religion, claims a-prori knowing of cause, and so must employ faith, as the self’s proof of belief in what is real. One then claims to know things are true because of their faith, which they feel quite tested in. Both of these kinds of actually conditional “absolute” knowing lenses have the problem that the effects of human consciousness and human feelings upon them are often construed as being problematic.

WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS, BUT WHERE DOES TRUTH FIT IN, AND IS IT QUESTIONABLE?  Does truth grow?

Here is where the great debates come in. These traditions of interpretation naturally find one or the other of these values of knowing more convenient to their arguments at times. Religion and science can claim to coexist comfortably in their own sphere’s of understanding, but on the individual level, proof to what is “true” in life tends to blend these ways of perceiving fact to ones situational history and advantage. When scientific principles seem violated, one claims disingenuous pseudo science or ego-character issues as the leading cause of leaving the true path. In religion, violating principles is considered sin, heresy, or some likewise ego-character issue in leaving the true path.

Politics juggles these parameters of defining reality to its advantage. We can assume as well, that individuals or groups in society who have an advantage over others, will manipulate both science and religion to their advantage. This puts the rest of us who are not rich and or powerful, at predatory impositions disadvantage. Unequal relationships create a survival stress that stimulates hostility and conflict; because it is actually threatening the life of those who do not have that sense of control and influence. The general public is put into an inherently insecure position in democracy, to be used.

WHO SAYS WHAT THE DEBATE IS AND WHAT IDEAS ARE RELEVANT?

The invention of democracy as a means to allay this sense of impotence and insecurity at fundamental levels, is “naturally” seen by established power groups as a potential threat to their superior position. So called dialectical materialism, the communist “scientific” notion of social order and hypothesis generation, seduced some into believing communism was inherently scientific and so in its own way beyond question, leading it to pretty much end up acting like a cult, just as most religions were begun by a cult leader assumed to be unquestionable. If you cannot question, you are being prevented from knowing something important. Why?

Democracy was a long road of self realization by the public or “mass” of humanity, that the average individual was completely at the mercy of others wills. Others who seemed to take the most from society and simultaneously care the least for the plight of the average citizen. Democracy gave us all that chance to have an influence equal to anyone else. For entrenched interest who feel their will is more important than the rest of us in fundamental ways, equality was to be stripped of its meaning. In time, elections, as in the United States, became ad-hominem side shows, where an intellectually disenfranchised population is set up to be mislead in very basic and up-front ways, and not allowed to question the information conduit itself! (Thanks to the truth is relative corporate media competition machine.)

The Internet seems to be a window of direct democracy and equality of a sorts, but most of us do not know where our words go, where they are prevented from going, who can censor them, what interest are interested in controlling them for their own good and not ours. We may exist in a window of opportunity that will be slammed in our face, and we not know it, or have no recourse to our freedom of speech disenfranchisement.

No matter who you rely on as your trusted source of truth or factual representation, your consciousness is now at risk from predatory interest that will “get away with” what they can to direct it to their own favor. There is a sales point of view that says, and I paraphrase; ‘Agree with everything they say. Then go on to do what you want.’ This philosophy of deception to get ones way and not quite be held accountable for ignoring others in the long run, seems to have become governmental policy in recent history.

The laws of the land are thought of as quaint or just a ‘gd piece of paper.’ The revocation of democracy is underway right under our noises, on our watches stewardship of our great historical trust. The very commons of America is under unrelenting assault by those who will say anything to get our support, disguised as representing one of us, or our identity interest, then go on to take and do whatever they feel like for themselves.  In this deceptive context politicians have a right to lie and mislead, that being  called a “tough campaign”.  The severely flawed fourth estate is now the ring leader in the circus side show called election campaigns.  Smoke and mirrors become the environment inside of democracy’s tent.  Much attention is played to the jugglers and the clowns walking the high wires of propaganda.

THE GREAT DECONSTRUCTION

This delusional state our democracy has devolved into, is one of the great challenges of this age. We will decide if deception or ignorance is good enough to represent our nation, and to some degree, the worlds future. We will decide if wedge issue pandering emotionally seduces us into us vs them competition, sinking the ship of truth in full context in the process. We will decide these things consciously or not, but Life Itself will be the final judge of what is true and real. No matter how impassioned I am about my beliefs, if I cannot question them, or cannot listen to the other side with an open heart and mind, I will have taken that step down a blind alley, not knowing the end of it may be the end of the earth itself.

There are warning signs of that dead end; out of context proof; emotionally guided reason, where attitude is the glue connecting the facts and not in context statistics; contempt for ones opposition, instead of fair minded consideration; ridicule, instead of reason. You get the idea.

We would be foolish to take the current debate over truth in the social/political realm, or “Culture War” as fair or balanced. Democracy, and the basic equality of individual freedom to make it valid, are not truly present. We are held under a cloud of idea and information control directed institutionally by fearful interest more concerned with their extra privileged well being. A proud facade of attitude pandering at election time is offered to democracies base–We the People.

Whether It be called the Truth, Life, Spirit or God, It is as present in a grain of sand as a galaxy of stars, for It is the very Whole detail of Life. The details of our existence can never be ignored. That is to surrender to extinction. Remember this thought as the smear, tar and feathers campaigns try to cover those fine points over with attitude, fear and insecurity.

=

=

Benafia

THE MENTAL MEASUREMENT PROBLEM

IDEAS THAT CONTROL HUMANKIND FOR THE BETTER AND WORSE

GIVEN THAT WE ARE NOW INVOLVED IN A HUMAN CAUSED MASS EXTINCTION EVENT*; THE DELUSIONS OF UNCHECKED ANARCHY INDIVIDUALISM MUST BE EXPOSED FROM BENEATH THAT INDIVIDUALISM’S GLOWINGLY SELF PROMOTING COMETARY IMPACT HAZE. TO NOT DO SO, IS LIKELY SUICIDAL.

.

All human beings, if of normal endowments, have quite similar needs. You would think from that standpoint, we would have much if not all to agree with. I suggest we in fact do, but from unchecked theory and inherent subjectivity projections, do not. We are fundamentally as one (all things are in relationship), but in practicality, have varying degrees of subjective interest and its implied individuality of view or perspective. This makes being human challenging, being that problematic differences of view constitute a relative ignorance of one another.

This fact tempts us to do many things over and through that ignorance. These actions created their own reactions, and can go on to seem enlightened, by one “side”, and possibly evil by another. This is the fate of being focused in separation and denial–human hearts and lives are left by the wayside. Much political interest revolve around this relative ignorance. “Sides” who can go on to claim to be more honest, or else seem to think more like certain situational positions the human family happens to be in–us and them.

As we run into one another through time and place, conflict occurs at times over identity, motives, and apparent intention. Much fantasizing also occurs (in reaction) over what seem apparent and obvious to the eye, but is truly more of judgement, not of knowing. We do not necessarily accept the rule of our ignorance, we presume we know by our feelings in matters instantly. We want to know, to be sure of ourselves, to be real and truthful to life as if has come to us. Yet we do assume much more than we know, and conversely, deny (in effect) not knot knowing what we do not seem to know.

All this can be noble and well intentioned, yet present deep fundamental issues to those not like us. This systemic set up for conflict and misunderstanding results in many theories that come to be seen as fact, actually as emotionalized consensual reality, but can be intrinsically dishonest. For a relative belief is still called a truth by feeling, not a theory. Many religions and philosophies have struggled with this attempt to be truthful and honest amidst an at times disturbing world, that seems itself somehow, beyond all their answers.

When we find ideas that seem to work though time and across varying lives, we believe we have discovered something valid. The cultures of the world are filled with ritual and perspective on being human that are passed on generation to generation because they seem to be associated with something that does work, and is so presumed real to life. Since we do not understand all of the universe, our assumptions can be both false yet seem to work as a truth because the outcome of their use seems to be true in ways to expectation. Pattern recognition and associations of cause and effect produce human theories that can be called truth, and by all appearances seem to be truth, while actually being an imagined association while the real truth operates alongside the actual fact’s of the matter unrecognized. The long assumed “flat earth” a big example.

Here is an example of unconscious “truth” selection from my own life;

I, like most people, could not stand the smell of hot tar often used on flat roofing. My whole life it had disgusted me. I would get a headache from it almost instantly. When in construction work, I at times had to do carpentry ahead of the roofers. It was not my favorite working situation.

But on an extended roofing stay of weeks, before long (approx 3 days), I loved that smell! It is as if life, through you, decides; well if you have to do this, you might as well enjoy it. Simply an amazing phenomenon. But does it really make tar smoke good? In conversation, I mentioned this to quite a renowned urologist friend of mine in the Veterans Administration. He commented to me; ‘Funny you should mention that! I really disliked cauterizing tissue during and after operations, now looking back, I love that smell! It made me feel like I was at home in a loving place.’

What would be “naturally” disagreeable ideas, I believe, achieve this same notion of good and home if we feel we must be around them. This would happen on a more unconscious level for ones own beliefs, and not necessarily, a liberal or conservative approves of their “opposing” ideas simply because they know they always live around them. It is about those notions we situationally accept and can become quite defensive about, even to the point of violence and conflict, yet do not really know what they actually “mean” and represent in the full world in their whole context.

-

THE ILLUSIONS OF TRUTH

Another kind of simple example of this, are the “old wives tale’s” that can be passed on and seem to be an alleged reality of truth, while in fact they are not. For specific example; do you actually believe the old adage that “sparing the rod spoils the child”? It might have produced a Pavlovian type result that seemed to create a “not spoiled child”, but what else did that custom of corporeal punishment actual produce along with the desired apparent conformity to another will which was tagged good?

Humankind is filled with these presumptions and assumptions about others that go on untested for various reasons. Usually these explanations endowed with much emotion and little fact, exist to preserve some order or entrenched opportunity in the society through time. These are put into question free zones, where questioning makes you a heretic, or a traitor to the institutionalized mindset. That these unquestioned assumptions are seen as being true and part of the culture, neither makes them true or right however. This is the conundrum posed to us by the “culture wars” that exist in some respects in most cultures that do not have a monolithic uniformity of conformity.

OF COURSE IT IS! THAT’S OBVIOUS. WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO PROVE? THAT WE ARE ALL WRONG!?

We literally have concepts that are seen as valid as the flat earth world view once held sacrosanct, and an earth-centric universe, a “truth” where all heavenly bodies obviously revolve around the earth. Cultures use these untested, or superficially tested beliefs as social order constructs, to be eventually used to test who is a “good” person and who is going off in some other unknown way, once questions appear. Questions most always threaten orthodoxies. Sometime orthodoxies are not classic ideological programs. They can be long standing consensual reality fortresses that serve a way things seem to be.

We can see in politics and religion this hiding behind conceptualized truths which are presumed dominant, so any who disagree will be construed as being; deceptive, irresponsible, malcontents, liberal, not for us, and fill in the blank. This is what I have come to call mind-blank, the attempt to bypass individual critical thinking abilities for pre-cast indoctrination programming. For our longstanding praisingly described individualism and its possession of Creation consciousness to be producing an extinction event, one thing should be obvious; We are inherently fatally wrong somewhere in our assumptions of the individual and society.

-

With that said, I am going to delve into the so called culture war in the United States. It has generally been defined as things like; red vs blue voters or states, “people of faith”, “values voters”, “liberal do gooders”, “tax and spenders”, “pro-life”, “pro-choice”, just to name a few.

You might notice that most of these culture war definitions come from the political right side of the spectrum, with the positive intonation leaning towards them, as if they are defining the whole issue of this “culture divide” that seems to separate the nations citizens into a kind of us against them mentality. This is no accident. A policy of divide and conquer is a time tested one. But why is this diversion from division being promote? What we need to examine are the operational results and logistics of this campaign to divide a nations conceptual mental parameters as voters, and ultimately, to make the US into a nation of fear based conformist without critical thinking abilities intact. Who is vying to control the inherently liberal institutions of democracy, and why?

ENTER THE PREDATORS

It is a fact that life exist off of life in our usual definition of what is alleged to be actually living. Living things gather energy in many ways form other living things. Sometimes this gathering is quite mutually benefiting, and in some instances it cost the life of another organism, with no regard for that organisms persistence as a species. As human kind switched from hunter gatherers, to farmers and herders, it seems a more gentle mind set evolved. The crops we cultured and the animals we herded, instead of being driven to extinction through predation, became assured of a kind of perpetual existence through farming. In an odd way, death became transient and life persistent.

The taking of life through perpetuating it, gained a certain giving of life quality to it, and that seemed to go along well with increased understanding of our environments, and possibly more peaceful societies, with enhanced rights to the average individual. It is notable that women in many ancient cultures were considered much more endowed with spiritual authority than they are even to this day. There seems to have been a kind of overthrow of perception towards might makes right, as male dominator societies found the gentile ones were easy pickings, being at the mercy of violence over deeper reason. No matter how right, honest and true one was, a blade or bullet ended you in an instant.

I do not believe all hunter gatherer societies were cruel all the time, we seem to value love and relationship too highly for that to have been the ever present mandate. However, being that we have switched essentially to this more controlled way of life and being, does not at all suggest that predatory actions are still not with us. We have switched predatory behavior into the social and economic spheres. There is a kind of under the radar use and abuse of people and environmental systems that most often produces the equation of have’s and have not’s.

This has led to conflict of opinion over the actions of human beings, being that some actions severely effect the lives of other human beings (and of course the environment’s of The Commons), going so far as to induce death and destruction as nations compete over resources. Yet nations can go on, after taking from others, to think they “owe” them nothing more in return. Same as in the now often sacredtized right of individuals to do what they will to others without much consequence. This is fundamentally delusional, no matter how exciting getting away with something may seem in the moment (an aspect of the criminal mind addiction). That is the seduction of separation and its ego self aggrandizing illusions. Interesting how the “responsibility” scenario of the now rampant corporate model is identical to that of a psychopath.

-

This “get out of my way” sense of competition for survival occurs on other levels as well. Economically, predation occurs when one takes the life energy from another to collect into ones own possession in a inherently disproportionate way, where forms of pyramid schemes thrive beyond view in the abstract environments allowed by an abstract and relative value system. The deception inherent to this paradigm, is the unaccountability to The Commons expressed in much individualistic ideological proclamation. In fact, The Commons is often denied its existence, as if once I dump exhaust into the air it is gone, or poison into tho ocean.

These kinds of avoiding and denying responsibility are required by much opportunistic individualism as it is manifest into the modern world. The same holds true to economic exploitation, even when rendered into conscious or unconscious contractual agreement. Agreement does not determine truth. Child labor law and an 8 hr. work day laws were instituted, not to punish exploitation, but to protect workers from known harm. Yet these days, some now work multiple jobs by necessity, as if the possible damage is negated by individuals seeming choice. Haze has returned in a new and glowing disguise of “free choice”.

That cometary impact haze begins to appear to blur away looking too closely at economic relationships, responsibility and accountability intrinsic to natures Whole nature. We cannot get around it by not acknowledging its existence. The corrupted individualism prefers this disguise of usage, or misuse under grand abstract platitude and proclamation. Infusing society with a “success” and achievement mentality producing an extinction event.

Money has allowed this form of predation to have a distanced and abstract quality, of great use to individualistic operationally blinded predators and manipulators of The Commons—the network of all Life. They can then structure society to place themselves at the top of the pyramid scheme’s of predation, while making that inequality seem natural and unchangeable. Now in this separated individualist delusional mindset; accountability can be called, taking from the haves. The emotionalized varieties of irresponsible possession claimed to be honest truth once an individuals cosmology is stunned into myopia.

-

IF ABSOLUTE TRUTH IS NOT AVAILABLE, HOW DO WE AGREE THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY ALL IN THIS TOGETHER WHEN PHILOSOPHIES AND BELIEF SYSTEMS INSIST WE ARE NOT?

That question is at the nexus of most of the world’s problems manifest by human behavior and belief.

There is something akin to the measurement paradox of physics, that, not surprisingly, exist in social and conceptual environments. In physics, the paradox assumes an intrinsic ambiguity in being; things seem to be two things (or everywhere) at once in “isolation”, but when observed by consciousness a “decision” is made one way or another. In my observations of being human, extrapolated from myself, we also exist in relative ambiguity, until we observe who we are in associating our self definition. As in physics, apparently mathematically logical patterns themselves, select out the reality for those possibilities. For we “separate” individuals, the logic (pattern recognition) in our self definition, selects out what we fancy to some extent. It is true of me typing on-line right now.

As much as the concepts we hold close presume separation, alienation, evil, and otherwise anti our interest occurrences in the outside world, we will have those confirmed, and likely confirmed to a large extent by our expectations of them. This does not necessarily occur at some blatantly obvious way we could normally just turn off. But it can, and is turned off at times by redirection of patterns, as in forgiveness and other conversions to more integrated perspectives and holistic views. Interrelationship and interconnection are the aspects of life most denied when often making our selective emotional judgements of ourselves and others.

We can hold or be aware of these salvation like events, seen as self realization, or sometimes called awakenings, or enlightenment, and a sense a deep belonging. When an ego in separation identity does this selecting into its disconnected fantasy’s world; paranoia, fear, delusion and other effects of disconnection appear. It is not good to be into patterns that ostracise oneself from the medium of all Life. The extinction event we are producing is perhaps the greatest example feedback loop of this. On the other hand, when one embraces the whole majestic complexity of Life as a creative process literally initiated from what has manifest all things, a most simple yet immersed belonging results. I suggest the role of true individualism will be defined by responsible and inclusive parameters, and not those of self isolation.

FALLING BACKWARDS

Memory and situations can come to impose understanding and insight, when conditions leave the imagination able to “see” oneself disconnected, abandoned, all on ones own, or otherwise stranded into the ego. Traditions and techniques are available for one to reassoicate with the ever present and eternal movement of Whole Life. The paradox between an isolated self and one moving with all Creation, immersed in place, exist simultaneously within us. We must learn to own our choices.

-

There is a kind of perpetual challenge presented to us in our current world situation, where many institutions and patterns of separation identity are in place to benefit those who have established pyramid/pharoh like fiefdoms of separation and denial, and conditioned society in Pavlovian like ways, to perpetuate their disturbed view. Indeed, much of commercial and mercantile state of mankind is in an actually destructive addiction to isolated individual identity, at times with abstract “God”‘s lending support to a separated out individual identity, comforted by the acquisition of the right beliefs and the right product, for a self made world view.

The modern world is under the influence of a lot of this suicidal addictions presence, merely because the environment’s temporarily allow a niche for their existence. Mass transportation in the US, as an example, was in many ways strangled by the automotive industry, which saw the advantage of reaping much more energy from the population through each of us needing our own vehicles to get around. A whole culture then evolves around the freedom of individual transportation. The trouble with these separation based ideologies is; they are inherently mortal. The cancer like exponential expansion of materialism and consumerism is a prime cause of our extinction event. Yet how many of the “winners” at this game of owning Creation are owning up to their responsibilities in this matter? Very, very, few.

If all 4 billion or so who could drive had cars now, the gas would rapidly run out. The price would have long been through the roof, and the toxic air may well have choked us all out already. Sorry ,no Internet. This repetitive, everyone needs one vehicle is the temporary niche, until that problematic type of self mobility can be reconfigured, if time remains. Pollution, waste and resource depletion, was not on the blindfolded commons radar of the individual travel units concept, as it sank the more collective one. It intended to sink the mass transportation option for private gain. That is trusting out current faith in individual initiative as now defined.

Separation based “freedom” is using up much of the oil that might have been used for something else. We have accepted by assumption, the notion that some answer will save us just in the nick of time. Some new invention or discovery will happen. That is a risky clairvoyant guarantee. Now that individuals are beginning to realize that a new energy source, or some other solutions need develop, new cultural paradigms have a space to emerge. That is our hope. That or be forced far backwards.

The problem is, this negative based innovation starts out behind the curve. The worlds population has bought into the seductions of mass consumption, leaving us with yet another monumental problem looming if paradigms related to individual identity are not changed into more cooperative forms. China and the developing world could become that mythical 800 pound gorilla getting into the worlds life-raft. Separation based ideologies come back to haunt humankind. That is the guarantee.

-

One might think from my blog, that I love big government and despise individual initiative; wrong! I trust in the true individuals spirit to be exactly in tune with what the universe, or God, needs. I actually think it will be wiser in the long term, to view the individual as a base; where insight and innovation are best realized, and not necessarily through committee or government institutions as they now exist. The current problem with trusting individuals to be true to life are all the aforementioned issues considered in this article, and then some.

In the interim, our cooperative interest do require government intervention until individuals step-up to the collective plate. I remain for individual initiative to be the guiding light of civilization and not default to religious or political institution. The question becomes one of survival necessity or extinction.

WHY YOU MATTER COMPLETELY

The world needs to look to its primary resource; the consciousness of each and every one of us. We need create new integrated concepts of the individual; That we are always responsible to all things, and so must listen to all things great and small. Human beings are capable of being a full partner in creating and acting responsibly to their potentials. We are currently struggling with numerous self imposed problems, conflict and environmental difficulties due to the inbred short sightedness of separation based ego identity, and the alienation problematic to it.

To answer this slicing and dicing of The Commons that separation finds so natural and right; I must act within the consciousness of the Whole. We are, after all, the offspring of Creation. It’s nature is also our own nature. We share this great and fundamental commonality, a singularity of purpose; Creation. In our worlds, we decide how small we are, or how connected. One leads to functionality in the long term. That other choice, dives into seemingly inevitable aberration, walking the plank of unchecked delusion. Society and culture, must be brought securely on-board of anyones concept of being.

Each individual is water in the ocean of culture. Culture provides universals such as language, even thought itself as we now conceive it, is relative in some respects to the forms of definition, even vowel and consonant nature and use. The illusion that my words here are all mine, is a fundamentally flawed and extraordinarily inhibited perception. Yet I can easily and lazily claim them to be my achievement, ignoring the wonder of humankind’s experience that has gone into just one word of “mine”. Ignoring the Commonalities of Life are done at ones own spiritual peril, and possibly ones culture.

It is stunning, the degrees of “taking for granted” that separation oriented individualism has encouraged, while unconsciously pushing earths ecosystems possibly past the point of no return–no responsibility to The Commons, no accountability to Life. Yet much self promoting of individual “achievement”.

This kind of self worship, enabled by the ignorance of The Commons, will boast all form and manner of individual merit and its ensuing self esteem perks and proselytizing. The difference between grand understanding, and little, is itself very small; The nature of ones own identity choices moment to moment. The existential issues over what is real are not solely up to human imagination.  I can dream of things plausible or coherent to the rational universe and see them tested.  Other ideas? Speculation.

I can dream of reversing gravity, simply by imagining it is reversed.  But is it reversed?  Try it now. (excluding space shuttle astronauts)  I have not heard of one human reversing gravity by thought alone, in the factually documented history of humankind.  We operate under the Laws of Being and at their leisure.  The onus is on us to understand where we fit in, and not where the Universe or The Commons does.  Much self promoting individualism refuses to mature to the correct flowing perspective, for what are proving to be suicidal reasons.

The great journey of my lifetime is always just beginning, always starting now. My own individual association to what is the nature of Life is my best chance at true self realization. My connection to that association knows only the bounds that I give it. To know Love in this context, with its ever touching connectivity, is to know enough.

-

-

-

-

*

Mass Extinction Underway | Biodiversity Crisis | Global Species Loss

Worldwide Plant Crisis Accelerating (E/Environmental Magazine) ….. The Current Biodiversity Extinction Event (U.S. National Academy of Sciences)