Christmas Christians Say No To Canadians?

No Canadians For You This Christmas!!!

-

I received this in an e-mail.  It does put forward the staggering contradictions and cherry picking that goes on in the blind “conservative” Bible following opportunism rampant these days.

I trust they know not what they do.

-

Subject: Can I own a Canadian?

Why Can’t I Own a Canadian?
October 2002

Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It’s funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:

-
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

-

-I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

-
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

-
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?

-

I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

-

A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this?

-
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

-
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

-
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

-
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? – Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

-
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your devoted fan,
Jim

—— End of Forwarded Message

-

-For More on this same post-

Why Can’t I Own a Canadian?

Why can’t I own Canadians? I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. …

-

-

No Canadians for you this Christmas!

Probably all sold out.

-

More Veterans Now Die From Lack Of Healthcare Than Combat

-Something to think about on this Veterans Day.  Those who put their lives on the line for this nations health may show the most contrast of the consequence of needing to decide on your money or your life;  the apparent code of the corporate bottom line health industry narrative.

With so much undiagnosed PTSD, does the public ignore reality?

We have reason to wonder—

-

Search Results

News results for harvard medical uninsured veterans health care

PhysOrg.com

Uninsured veterans is a crime on Veterans Day‎ – 18 hours ago Is this what our veterans were fighting for? Harvard Medical School estimates … because they lacked health insurance and thus had reduced access to care. …

-

-

Lack of health insurance leads to death of 2,266 U.S. military veterans in 2008

11. November 2009 03:56

// //

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

America; The “Best Health Care System” Ranks About #37

-

Following the propaganda parade about not messing with what aint broke?

Here is some perspective

-

-

The Pivot Point of Perception; A Point of View

Odd Sayings on Blog Post

It has become popular, or a more known awareness, to declare we humans tend to believe in things that confirm our existing bias.  I do not consider this “breakthrough” in awareness anything new for thinking people: Do I question my beliefs or are they safely behind the goal line?  Psychologist, and to some extent religious teachers, deal with this phenomenon of personal perception and assumption from ones history as a way to guide present perception.

I’m bringing this up for a comment I left on someones blog post, where I used my “pivot point of perception” concept regarding our viewpoints, or how we teeter our tauter toward one idea or another.  I’ve used this idea now for many years, in my writings mostly.  I thought; Did I really go and put that idea on a spiritual blog regarding a poem?  I may need to explain a few things for anyone dropping by to see what this blogger is up to.

-

Politics, and many other platforms for ideologies, are full of these kinds of one side or another concepts.  Unfortunately, this “existentializes” considerations from true objective analysis, to; “We all do it” status. Then I can offer my “equal” opinions kinds of ad-hominen linkages, existing in an assumed theoretical connection dialectic.  Example?; Why won’t Obama show me his real birth certificate?

I’m just saying. But then, exactly why am I motivated, and how do I energize my awareness of “issues” on subjects that allegedly require a proof which I quite likely am already not accepting?  How does manipulation and denial work its magic in human consciousness?

We create these circular reasoning matrices, looping our “inquiries” into self supporting fact and theory bias, perhaps because an assumed known is better than the awesome ambiguity and effort of objective consideration. It is seemingly  easier, and presumed more comforting, to validate what I claim to know; easy ego deference. I would suggest that most of us are aware of how we lead with our imaginary confidence on matters.  Matters that may well be rooted in fragile and perhaps instigated bias toward presumably self supporting notions, if for some reason we wished to know the real truth.

-

I have long preferred that I base my belief’s on solid evidence, but this does not mean I always do.  When it comes to momentary personal identity, I can side with the negative or the positive, then search out supporting evidence for my momentary direction.  So I have called this choice a catchy phrase; The Pivot Point of Perception.

We may face these persona pivot points of perception, at not a moments notice, suddenly a situation has cast “its” spell over me.  I load up the narrative, going up or down with the interpretation I am now following.  Overall, this phenomenon can be labeled many things like personal growth; transformation; spiritual identity; higher self, and other such descriptions—-when I understand the formula of narration I’ve scummed to. Now the awareness position seems inherently wise, or risen above ignorance and denial.  We can determine we are more in the presence of honest truth, instead of self serving varieties of what are actually opinion; these will disavow honest questioning—-of the self.

When I, or we, take on the negative assumption, it may make us quite passionate, or at times even depressed, but it likely is not truly pursing objective evidence in any solid way, be it over personal feelings or projected out political ones.  This seems to be a major issue we humans juggle with daily.  We may build strategies to “put it away” if this teeter tauter emotional pivot is found uncomfortable, destructive, or requiring a life with too much ambiguity for me to emotionally or spiritually handle. The self medication may then become denial; the prescription given to me in instituted ignorance; politically, and or spiritually/emotionally. Ignorance is instituted when objective questioning is denied access.

-

But for some of us, for whatever reason, and the universe does operate on reason, no matter how irrational anyone or thing seems; some of us wish to pile up the negative to permanent heights in consciousness.  The question, faced or not becomes; Am I actually respecting reality as it really is, or do I not know if I or someone is not actually only making things up?  Can I confidently question myself while feeling safe in finding problematic zones and addressing them?  In the world; Do I allow others this same self respect; true in me for I extend it honestly to them?

-

This is why evil is in the hands of ignorance, and not actually true intentions of an honest life, no matter who we are or what we think.

Jesus Would Be Arrested For Feeding The Homeless

Jesus Would Be Arrested For Feeding The Homeless?

It’s your second coming or did you say you were coming for seconds?

-
http://jonathanturley.org/2009/03/23/dont-feed-the-local-wildlife-man-arrested-for-feeding-homeless-in-orlando/#more-9255

-

…as we turn the Statue of Liberty around, facing inward, back toward France.

-

Liberalism vs Propaganda’s Definition

What is that sinister liberalism and its value eroding ethos all about?-

“The essence of the Liberal outlook lies not in what opinions are held, but in how they are held: instead of being held dogmatically, they are held tentatively, and with a consciousness that new evidence may at any moment lead to their abandonment.” -Bertrand Russell

-This means liberalism is inherently powered by critical thinking with an outlook on The Whole of systems, and not some ideologically bound self identified notion.

This observation of Bertrand Russell is what modern conservatism and conservatives cannot seemingly comprehend; viewing liberalism instead, as a weakness of “values”, rather than evidence of the strength of the critically thinking endowed mind; that Life has identifiable reason in Its evidence.

Conservatism; a one way street of perceptual comprehension, signed by ideological abstractions, opens a Pandora’s box of uncheckable hypothesis, and alleged a-prior truths that most all conservatives depend on, as if they knew what they cannot. This is also why they are attracted to crowd behavior, as well as list of buss worded thought-terminating clichés, as if like mindedness and conformity equals reality and evidence of truth. But once science, or our God given ability to analyze our environment and draw relative logical conclusion, is unplugged, well, the world of conversion or manipulation is one’s oyster.
-

With the implosion of popular conservatism going on after the 2008 election and economic collapse, we see conservatives stuck in front of their own broken mirror, as always, looking for who other than they themselves can be blamed.

Conservative talk radio and TV exemplifies the regurgitation of dogmatic “truths” being robotically/habitually spouted over and over amidst a radically altering environment. Being trapped in their backward facing broken images, they are reinventing the fallen pieces into Frankensteinian fear reflectors. This conglomerated creation seemingly projects outward their own misgivings and seeming inability in establishing a real connected life that recognizes all human beings as real and relevant people.

An incestuous political correctness of the right right, seems their holy grail pursued as their standard hallmark of abstract purity. For instance, in their imaginary, or disingenuous, world view of holding Obama to McCain’s professed “earmark” standard, the Omnibus bill just signed to keep the government open, had earmarks of 28 senators of the 35 who voted against it. Today they were proclaiming purity all over the liberal media waves, decrying Obama’s hypocrisy and lack of integrity.

It has become common place in congress to hear earmarks being bemoaned by some on the meandering right (McCain’s favorite topic it seems), that actually sound like very important local issues, but not to them. Some earmarks are quite defensible, being clearly health and scientific information obtaining programs, and not as assumed, the source of all wasteful big government ills. Yep. 28 of 35 no’s had earmarks on the bill they voted against. Principle? And all this whole earmarks steam blowup, means Obama is protecting Washington as usual, but actually comes to less than 2% of the entire bill.

Smoke and broken mirrors with hints of purifying or putrefying abstractions wafting through conservatism’s always holy intentioned air. It is what shell games ideological distractions thrive on. What smoke and mirrors allows manipulators of the “common folk” to thrive on. I cannot fathom those who believe what they are hearing on the right, yet I must remind myself some think the contrived conservative blather is truth revealed. The liberal MSM is out to get you. Trust us and only us… Critical thinking impairment extraordinaire.
-

“Success” is another one of these modern conservatism’s claims of ownership, which makes it a natural steerable concept for most anyone wanting to reduce their tax. Tax is being morphed into a liberal duty imposed on subjective success, instead of a duty to accountability and responsibilities to more than oneself. The brain twisting definition of my self in isolation “success”, must be kept abstract and holy. If your (or my) success exploits the environment to ruin, or uses the desperate as fuel to dump when desired, why it is all your pure accomplishment and hard working good deed. Wasn’t accomplishment to be rewarded? Government and the lazy are out to take your stuff! Can’t you see!

Detachment, abstraction, obfuscation, diversion of consciousness, crippling of critical thinking ability; all these are must be’s for conservatism to thrive. It is about lazy faith and angry sure opposition. The exact kind that had Reagan and Bush vastly grow the government while claiming to protect you from it,…and how they open up the nations Commons to plunder.

Conservatism is separation/alienation and fall guy dependent; scapegoat enabled, with projection imperative for any negative self accountability. Freedom, liberty, in concert with responsibility/accountability, these are its secret Nemesis. Conservatism will eventually defeat democracy if minds are allowed to ferment into inebriated stupor over illusions of ideological simplicity and absoluteness.  Yet insecurity can convince one of most anything, without objective attempts at truth evaluation, conservative paranoia’s could one day, if allowed the power they seek to keep, bring down democratic civilization.

Yes, conservatism hates our accountable/responsible freedoms. It proposes detached abstract impressions of freedom that can enable society to atrophy to a warlord state, more likely a corporate warlord/servant state. And all while folks are sure it is the path to averting such a fate by opposing liberalism… Follow that turnip truck of ideological certainty closely.

If your God or your philosophy finds rational peer objectivity a threat, likely what you worship is not real, being it, through you, is afraid of questions as to the fact of its existence.

-

-

Obama: Time to rein in earmarks – David Rogers – POLITICO.com

“I am signing an imperfect omnibus bill because it is necessary for the ongoing functions …. Here is what the Omnibus Bill will cost the American family: …

-

liberalism: Definition from Answers.com

liberalism n. The state or quality of being liberal. A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual.

-

Orographic Lift on Santa Rita Mts. and Metric Madness

–This orographic lift on Santa Rita Mts. went on to anchor several hours of showers in the area. That is a real mission from way back when in foreground.

-I’ve lived in these parts of Arizona for well over 20 years, and we’ve always had metric (mileage) around here, so I don’t know what the rest of you all are waiting for. (I-19 at least) But unlike here; when you all go European on us, make the speed signs metric as well, so foreigners will think we are actually logical and stuff.

Once the speed and distance signs match mathematically, the newcomers will not be going so slow, causing the Americans to bottle up behind them and do risky passing maneuvers on the right. But who is counting?…

Maybe John McCain could earmark an update on this?  He’s used to risky passing maneuvers on the political right.

There is hope…

-

Keep on trucken’

Conservative Misanthropy

Conservative misanthropy is a not so hidden prime motivator on full display these days. It thrives on certain psychological dysfunctions that include fear of others as inducement to sameness; ideological conformity with its perceptive counterparts.

Conservatism is after all, defined against “The Other”, human beings who seem alien to the conserved group identity . Conservatism is also self validating, as pointing out conservative opposition to others in the world, or to the changing dynamic to challenges in life, validate conservative myopia; The Other is obviously against them, are a cause of stress, and so hypocritical in any alleged honorable intention. With valid positive intentions eliminated in the others, conservatives can go on to condemn, and to condemn they do.

Just my bringing this up usually gets me named a hypocrite by right wingers. That never changes, since it is an aspect of their spirituality/cosmology. Evidence from the world is ideologically contoured to circle back to abstract ideal narratives. Think of the major modern conservative proselytizers, the common theme will be contempt for objective critical thought and for not a change of mind toward inclusion, inclusion here usually described as liberalism.

Conservatism is a way of denying Life in the moment; Life, with its constant questions, new stresses and implied imperative to decide, what will I do next. Life Itself, is denied Its Presence, instead, a varying array of security blankets are sown with ideal platitude, and if only every one else just thought like us it would all be OK.

Conservatism’s inherent insecurity profile makes them highly susceptible to blame and projection, or rationalizing others as The Problem. This trick of the psyche is a means of self medication for internal contradiction. Notice the many conservative exclusionary philosophies from, religion, law, economics, you name it. It, is all about cutting up Creation to include the conservatives who are implicitly the Haves; have money or have the “real” God, or real valuses, and exclude the others who need not be considered as viable and worthwhile human beings, because they are different.

.

Two highly paid public conservative propagandist; Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly, have let on to some intersting inner dynamics on occasion. I remember, (on the downfall of at least two major conservative programs that had long been promoted as heroic in the public eye), they each said to this effect; ‘They make me say this stuff.’ When I had heard this at different times from both of them I wondered; Then when are you saying what you would say as a human being? Who is this they that make these guys say things?

Here was obvious indication why I call them paid propagandist, and how many others are there following some sort of (they) program, I do not know. I do know they all foster fear, hate, and loathing for a list of others. This blame projection to others reveals what they are pandering to in the public; those who need target outward the burdens, or perceived burdens of their lives to convenient others as scapegoats. This reveals something big about conservative followers spiritual state of being.  Just to observe this phenomenon makes one a part of their problem.

.

Likely, conservative leaders, (and many of their followers) were in some manner abused; physically or emotionally early in life, and feel life is in threat of being taken from them, hence reaction empowerment. Fear, not Love, is their answer, for it seems to hold the power of control. Many conservative leaders are as ones stunted emotionally in childhood; they seem to both favor the ways of the bully, and project blame on anyone outside of their perceived identity who seems to blame them. Conservatives consider these others as themselves bullies and potential tyrants. (Why they despise the governement holding them accountable for their impacts on The Commons, or all living systems and environments, with tax.) Conservatism is expert at one thing; making others accountable for error and evil, and thus, blame.

Reality reversal occurs as explanation to one who feels they are on the side of good, while being somehow threatened; must be bad others. Perception of the outside and inside worlds becomes convoluted, resulting in much of the conservative disdain for Intellectual Elites, who somehow conspire with facts to construct threatening theory claimed as truth. Much conservatism, be it the constant socialism scarecrow, presumed secular humanist as presumed God haters, and societies ills being only of outside origin, The Others of Life are a constant threat to conservative limited paradigms of humanity inclusion.

.

And so most conservatism, wherever it is in the world, hides from the present moment. It hides from full Love with exclusion, and from Life with denial of inclusion. This self crippling of the authentic human spirit creates an inner contradiction, and like most contradiction; consciousness does not approve of dissimilar truths. Likely, again, someone outside the conserved group identity brings this contradiction up, and they receive the tag of blame ownership.

Conservatives then become incapable of perceiving commonality across human spectrum’s of thought and behavior, as in any fundamental way similar to their own belief in concept and action. This preserves or conserves The Otherness. To see this contempt of “otherness”, just listen to the underlying distrust of others emanating from proselytizing conservatives (Coulter, Keys, Hannity etc). You will not hear of the Universality of Life, not hear of the spiritual imperative that is the challenge to humankind; to be whole enough Love without concern for results. Simply, to Love instead of, in effect, worshiping Fear. Instead, most conservative underlying motivation will be first, and remain, Fear. Yes, even after the list of glowing platitude parade, or before it, will be the scare tactics to stimulate fear of others.

Conservative Misanthropy? It is the doubting of the self, the true self denied, while a facade of ideology is constructed to define otherness and who is worthy of Love and Life. Love kept securely in quarantine, outside our Common Heart, by denying this Life Constant.

It is likely to the detriment of our times, that conservatism continues its unrelenting pride in separation from The Whole of Life, by the nature of their own beliefs.

-

-

Just as many proud and self assured conservative Christians live in a state of denial about the message and ways of Jesus Christ, economic conservatives disdain the adaptive response of governments to changing sociological issues in society. This link below touches on the historical exclusion by an Egyptian leader of the Buddhist like message of Christ, which was removed from most Christian religious teachings to favor hierarchical mindsets and church structures 1,700 years ago. This leads to the proposition that conservatives can be conserving someone else’s distortion.

-

http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/resisting-church-changes-738502.html

-

Eastern Timezone breaks into 2009

This breaking news.

A NATION DIVIDED INTO PAST AND FUTURE!

The Eastern timezone has gone a year ahead of the rest of the nation.

Is this some new idea from Alphainventions?

Now what do we do?

Hey. Just thought I’d call you from the past. What is it like in the future?

Time will tell.

Happy New Year

but more importantly

Now

Happy New Moment

From the past

Benafia

Palin’s Socialism of the Northland

Important to have no shame, when shaming ones opponent with ones own behaviors.

We’re becoming quite familiar with the entire campaign policy of not practicing what you preach. The demolition derby express is noted for claiming something a positive when they do it, and a negative for their opponents when they allege their opposition said something remotely like it. Seems they will say anything to fool anybody susceptible, even when they do the exact same things they just accused others of.  Straight. Right.

{I don’t know about you, but I don’t mind my gas expenses going to bailout all those Alaskans who got over $3,000.00 apiece just for living there.  Who needs that kind of socialism anyway?  Oh wait a minute.}

What an administration of straight talk that would be; example, for the “bailout” and against it at the same time, suspending the campaign but not at the same time, ridiculing implying societies use of wealth for societal health, while one on the team is actually and actively supporting doing the redistribution! Actually doing what they just interpret from others statements as a theoretical direction, then blame them for doing. Not guessing by wild extrapolations of a phrase. Doing. The convoluted double talking express requires converts to succeed in overthrowing reality. Seems some Americans require embedded flaws in cognitive perception.  I suppose that is to fill in for the once suspended campaign, which seems to only have permanently suspended reality.

How the right must break context in half, just to fool those primed or familiar with being fooled, or the easily frightened. Perhaps what we should be fearful of is this kind of duplicitous campaigning, that puts naked ambition ahead of reality.

-

From “Current”

-
Quote:

The state that she governs has no income or sales tax. Instead, it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields. The proceeds finance the government’s activities and enable it to issue a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state. One of the reasons Palin has been a popular governor is that she added an extra twelve hundred dollars to this year’s check, bringing the per-person total to $3,269. A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist—Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine—that “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” Perhaps there is some meaningful distinction between spreading the wealth and sharing it (“collectively,” no less), but finding it would require the analytic skills of Karl the Marxist.

Above info from this site;

Comrade Palin’s Alaska – Sharing The Wealth! // Current

Oct 28, 2008 … Current TV story, Comrade Palin’s Alaska – Sharing The Wealth!, posted by TheRealEdwin, Looks like Obama’s not the only “socialist” in the …

-

Palin’s Alaska: As Close to Socialism as America Gets | PEEK …

Oct 27, 2008 … But the truth is, Sarah Palin’s Alaska is about as close to socialism as America gets. As Yglesias recently noted, “You have collective …

-

Ben Smith’s Blog: McCain camp hits back at ‘diva’ Palin – Politico.com

she is going all mavericky on us… actually she has been straining at the ….. The palin/mccain camp is just what it is. I know your boss got on them, …

-

-

Fallen off of turnip truck? Bridge to wealth distribution for sale

DEBT REDISTRIBUTION IS ALREADY COMING TO POCKET BOOK NEAR YOU!

.

Making an argument, one turnip at a time.

.

Someone does think we all just fell off the proverbial turnip truck. Then bought a sales pitch for the Golden Gate Bridge.

An economy is wealth distribution, or spreading the wealth around in a very basic sense.

Duh?

But that is not all!

What is that debt being run up for Iraq and other neo-con like fiascoes forced upon us?

DEBT DISTRIBUTION!

HELLO!

Come on. I know they are desperate for a “hook”, but alleging socialism, is a hook, line and sinker for the thought impaired, when attribute to Obama’s comment. We are facing the largest wealth disparity in history. And yet have some of the most intransigent problems to, yes, pay for to repair.

I’m not personally paving the highways I drive on. How about you? Where does that money come from if we all want tax cuts and are poorer now since the neo-cons ran the ship aground. Trees! That must be it. We will find that money on trees. How could I have been so blind!

Tricks have to be played to keep the increasing wealth disparity flowing up, up and away.

Then there are the treats.

Thousands for Iraq we each have to cough up. Yep. It’s wealth distribution alright, only its out of our pockets and into corporate bank accounts.

Debt distribution we got coming. Thanks to we should know who. It is wealth distribution only no regular folks get any. We get taken. Those trillions are coming out of our pockets, but where do they land?

Not in our pockets. I’m getting the trick now. Really sneaky I must say! What do they often call it? Bait and switch, or just seduce the gullible? Feed the turnips.

Gee thanks! Who knew debt distribution was wealth distribution on steroids?

Not the turnips.

-

Spread the debt around?

Spread the wealth around?

Economies do all this.

A society need determine what works best for its survival and the general welfare of all its citizens. Unless we wish no government whatsoever. Let the predators and exploiters have at it, while we wonder where the “collateral damage” will begin and end. No health air or water, except if you happen to afford its skyrocketing price. Global meltdown sped up to a lifetime near you. Who knew?

Live for the moment? Cause tomorrow may not be habitable.

Sounds like a plan to me.

———————————————————————–

Click on link below to see governments debt chart during Republican and Democratic administrations.

Increases in the National Debt Chart

Republican President Nixon’s largest increase in the National Debt, by the way, was $34.97 Billion in 1971. Democratic President Lyndon Johnson’s largest …

ATTACK ON MCCAIN SUPPORTER — A FRAUD

THE ATTACK ON MCCAIN SUPPORTER DISCOVERED TO BE A FRAUD;

She was not where claimed.

Mark on face was backwards; as might happen in a mirror.

She confessed.

—————————————

I noticed much hullabaloo on WordPress over this incident. So checked it out.

—————————————

Telegraph.co.uk

Woman says attack on her linked to McCain bumper sticker – 14 hours ago

… who became angry when he saw a John McCain bumper sticker on her car, … her a lesson for being a McCain supporter,” according to a police statement. …

Republican volunteer charged for false claim of mutilation by …