Give politics a rest while treating the tricksters. Real Ghost live and in person on TV!
Give the vote to all Ghost!
-
Ghost Hunters Live on SCI FI: This Halloween. Hosted by Josh Gates and Steve Valentine, with guest star Amanda Tapping. This Halloween– Friday, Oct 31 at …
-
My ghost has an agent?
-
From Link TV, THE PLANET series
-
-
McCain and Palin Are Trying to Take Political Lying to the Next Dimension
By Robert Parry, Consortium News. Posted September 15, 2008.
McCain and Palin reach a new level of campaign dishonesty as they tell lies about their records and their opponent. But will they pay a price?
{Here from Alternet: Other Alternet info. below article by Robert Parry.}
Despite all the chatter about how “historic” Campaign 2008 has been, it is the McCain-Palin ticket that it is truly testing the limits, not of race or gender politics, but whether the United States is ready to enter into a new dimension of political lying.
Until two weeks ago, it would have been hard to believe that any political figure would have had the audacity to step into the national spotlight by telling the bald-faced lies that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has. Yet, many Americans have embraced her enthusiastically and don’t want to hear anything negative about her.
Palin’s most obvious lie is one that she has repeated over and over: “I told Congress, ‘thanks but no thanks’ about that Bridge to Nowhere.” Now, however, anyone who has bothered to fact-check this claim knows that Palin supported the bridge until Congress removed the earmark and then she kept the money to use on other state projects.
Palin also presents herself as a “reformer” who can’t stand earmarks or the lobbyists who arrange such wasteful pork-barrel spending — except that she hired Alaska’s top Washington lobbyists to secure millions of dollars in earmarks for her town, Wasilla, and for her state, including sending off a wish list of nearly $200 million just this year.
With the help of the lobbying firm and her annual treks to Washington, Palin secured a stunning $27 million in earmarked funds for Wasilla, a town then with about 6,000 residents. Some of Palin’s projects were considered such prime examples of Washington pork that they were cited in anti-earmark reports compiled by none other than Sen. John McCain earlier this decade.
When ABC’s news anchor Charles Gibson asked Palin about her past support of earmarks and her backing for the Bridge to Nowhere, Palin simply refused to acknowledge that she had made misleading or false claims about herself.
“It has always been an embarrassment that abuses of the ear form — earmark process has been accepted in Congress,” Palin said. “And that’s what John McCain has fought. And that’s what I joined him in fighting.”
But Palin is not alone in simply denying reality. Her partner, John McCain, has shown his own ability to not blush while lying.
On the ABC-TV show “The View,” McCain was confronted with Palin’s contradictory record of arranging earmarks while selling herself as a reformer. McCain simply ignored the facts and declared, “not as governor she didn’t.”
McCain’s Lies
But McCain now has his own long trail of stunning lies, both about his opponent Barack Obama and McCain’s dubious reputation for clean politics. After presiding over a convention notable for its partisan rancor — including endless mocking of Obama as a “community organizer” — McCain said his presidency would be about eliminating “partisan rancor.”
Earlier in the campaign, McCain approved ads accusing Obama of everything from causing $4 a gallon gasoline (a silly charge) to stiffing wounded U.S. troops in Germany by canceling a visit because he couldn’t bring along cameras (a false accusation).
More recently, McCain and his team have blamed Obama for passing a law that would require sex education for kindergarteners and for calling Palin a “pig” when the Democratic nominee criticized McCain’s economic package by saying it was like “putting lipstick on a pig.”
Though McCain himself had applied the common expression to Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan, Obama’s use of the image was ripped from its context and twisted into a “sexist” attack on Palin.
As for the kindergarten sex-education ad, the McCain campaign had contorted Obama’s support for a program that would teach young school children how to avoid sexual predators into providing them “comprehensive sex education.”
When confronted on “The View” about these two dishonest ads, McCain insisted that “actually they are not lies.” He then went on to argue that his own use of the “lipstick on a pig” remark was different because he was talking about Clinton’s health-care plan.
Barbara Walters, one of the program’s co-hosts, challenged this excuse, noting that Obama was speaking about change, not Palin.
McCain’s response was that Obama “chooses his words very carefully,” suggesting apparently that when McCain has used the phrase he doesn’t. McCain added as his defense that harsh things have been said about him, too, and that “this is a tough campaign.”
At the end of McCain campaign ads — including others that have compared Obama to Paris Hilton and distorted his positions on taxes, health care and energy — the voters hear McCain intoning, “I approved this message.”
Successful Strategy
All of this might not be so troubling to Americans who care about the future of their democracy, except that the smears are working.
The McCain-Palin ticket is surging in the polls behind this strategy of deliberate lies and deceptive rhetoric. Many national polls now put the Republicans ahead in the presidential race and show them quickly closing the gap with Democrats in congressional races.
Not only has the lying worked well in raising fresh doubts about Obama and lifting the spirits of Republican activists, but it’s had a curious impact on the national press corps, which has difficulty standing up to what might be called strategic lying that saturates the media’s capacity for fact-checking and plays on the desire to appear “even-handed.”
For weeks, the national press corps essentially has followed a “plague on both their houses” approach to campaign distortions, even though the McCain campaign was by far the more egregious — and systematic — in its pattern of misrepresentations.
Indeed, it seems that the McCain strategy included preemptive berating of the news media for “bias” as a way to scare journalists away from taking note of how McCain’s strategic lying was reshaping the electoral landscape.
It took the New York Times until Sept. 13 to publish a comprehensive story about McCain’s cynical approach to politics.
The Times story noted that McCain’s “strategy now reflects a calculation advisers made this summer — over the strenuous objections of some longtime hands who helped him build his ‘Straight Talk’ image — to shift the campaign more toward disqualifying Mr. Obama in the eyes of voters.”
The Times added that “for all the criticism [of the lies and distortions], the offensive seems to be having an impact. It has been widely credited by strategists in both parties with rejuvenating Mr. McCain’s campaign and putting Mr. Obama on the defensive since it began early this summer.”
Times columnist Bob Herbert made a similar point in a Sept. 13 op-ed, writing: “While watching the Sarah Palin interview with Charlie Gibson and the coverage of the Palin phenomenon in general, I’ve gotten the scary feeling, for the first time in my life, that dimwittedness is not just on the march in the U.S., but that it might actually prevail.”
McCain’s Record
Beyond the studied anti-intellectualism — even anti-realism — now surrounding the McCain-Palin campaign, there is another longer-term question of whether McCain’s current behavior is just a “campaign mode” aberration or whether he ever deserved the favorable depiction as a “maverick” and a “reformer.”
Though McCain has bucked his party on some high-profile issues, such as campaign finance reform and earmarked spending, his actual record reveals him to be a doctrinaire conservative with his own checkered past on ethics.
McCain, in effect, reinvented himself as a “reformer” in the 1990s after he got caught in the late 1980s in a savings-and-loan influence-peddling scheme with Cindy McCain’s business partner, Charles Keating.
Even in recent years while cultivating his reform image, McCain — as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee — has maintained cozy relationships with business lobbyists and, indeed, stocked his campaign staff with many of the insiders he rails against.
Yet, because of his long history of flattering press clippings — he once called the journalists on his “Straight Talk Express” his “base” — McCain seems to always expect gentle treatment, regardless of his actions. That confidence has enabled him to get away with stating the opposite of obvious truths and suffering little consequence.
For instance, when the New York Times published an article on Feb. 21 describing McCain’s relationship with a telecommunication lobbyist, his campaign issued a statement declaring that “John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country [in Congress] with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election.”
McCain issued this statement despite the clear public record about his role as one of the so-called “Keating Five,” senators who did favors for savings-and-loan wheeler-dealer Charles Keating.
In 1987, Keating wanted to frustrate oversight from federal banking regulators who were examining his Lincoln Savings and Loan Association. At Keating’s urging, McCain wrote letters, introduced bills and pushed a Keating associate for a job on a banking regulatory board. McCain then joined several other senators in two private meetings with federal banking regulators on Keating’s behalf.
Two years later, Lincoln collapsed, costing the U.S. taxpayers $3.4 billion. Keating eventually went to prison and three other senators from the Keating Five saw their political careers ruined. McCain drew a Senate reprimand for his involvement and later lamented his faulty judgment. “Why didn’t I fully grasp the unusual appearance of such a meeting?” he wrote in his 2002 memoir, Worth the Fighting For.
But some people close to the case thought McCain got off too easy — and actually may have been the senator most deeply entwined with Keating. Not only was McCain taking donations from Keating and his business circle, getting free rides on Keating’s corporate jet and enjoying joint vacations in the Bahamas — McCain’s second wife, the beer fortune heiress Cindy Hensley, had invested with Keating in an Arizona shopping mall.
In the years that followed, however, McCain not only got out from under the shadow of the Keating Five scandal but found a silver lining in the cloud, transforming the case into a lessons-learned chapter of his personal narrative.
Nevertheless, years later when the Times article questioned just how ethical the “new” John McCain really was, McCain lashed back with a categorical statement that was categorically untrue, saying he had “never done favors for special interests.”
When one considers how other recent presidential candidates, such as Al Gore in 2000, were treated for perceived misstatements about their personal records, it’s striking how effectively McCain has escaped serious criticism for lying — and how he has sustained his reputation as a supposed “truth-teller.”
So, perhaps, the current pattern of McCain approving dishonest ads and embracing a calculated strategy of false statements about Barack Obama shouldn’t come as a surprise.
McCain now seems to have located a soul-mate in Sarah Palin, who shares McCain’s assuredness in making public statements that are clear-cut lies and then insisting they are absolute truth.
The only remaining question is how well this strategy will work.
-=======================================================
-
-
And a whole lot more from Alternet
-
The Nasty Truth: Free Trade Agreements May Scuttle Green Jobs Plans
A Solar Gold Rush Is Spreading From California to New Jersey
How the Economy Is Affecting Your Sex Life
How Much Damage Has Eight Years of Conservative Rule Done to Americans’ Psyches?
Patients v. Big Pharma: Supreme Court to Decide Landmark Case
Why I Love Taxes — And Most Americans Do, Too
It’s Time for a Trillion-Dollar Tag Sale at the Pentagon
Can You Guess a Person’s Politics by Their Personality? Psychologist Team Says YesWill the Economic Crash Take Down Our Hopes for Clean Energy?
Michelle ‘McCarthy’ Bachmann — The Hate Monger of Minnesota
The New York Times’ Biggest Screw-up Since They Sold the War in Iraq
Don’t Look Now, There’s a Huge Wave of Inflation Coming Toward Us
Can “Card-Check” Lead to Labor’s Comeback?
Where Have All the Water Fountains Gone?
Obama vs. McCain: Progressive Voter Guide to Reproductive Justice and Gender
How McCain Turned His Back on the Vietnamese Man Who Saved His Life
Republicans Face Huge Losses in the House and Senate Across the Country
Obama Campaign Takes the Fight to FOX
A Class Analysis of Palin’s Classy New Clothes
The Great Porn Misunderstanding: Pornography Is Mostly About Fantasy, Not Reality 
5 Reasons Why Wall Street’s Bailout Won’t Work
Why Straight People Need to Get into the Fight for Marriage Equality
Facing Substantial Delays at the Polls, Voters Sue the State of Pennsylvania
Getting to the Bottom of the Deceptive, Secretive and Artificial Iraq-U.S. Negotiations
Obama vs. McCain: Progressive Voter Guide to Water Issues
If the GOP Had Listened to ACORN’s Advice, the Mortgage Industry Wouldn’t Be in Meltdown
Michael Moore: No More Socialism for the Rich!
Sen. Ted Stevens Found Guilty on All Counts in Corruption Trial
Families of the Victims Tortured by Chicago Detectives Rejoice at First Arrest
The Devastation in Iraq Is Systematic — And It’s About to Get Much Worse
Some Voters Are Going to Have to Lose Their Homes Before They Connect the Dots
Bush Undermines Democracy with Attack on 200,000 New Ohio Voters
Manufacturing Thirst: The Hidden Water Costs of Our Industrial Economy 
Obama vs. McCain: Our Democracy and Elections Are Both Vibrant and in Peril — Voter Guide
Republican Fears of an Obama Landslide Victory Unleash Civil War within the Party
Palin: ‘I Don’t Know’ If Abortion Clinic Bombers Are Terrorists
Bono: “Let’s Put Humanity Back on Earth” 
I’ve Got a Bad Case of Election Sickness
Military Mom: Why I’m Sour About Sarah Palin
Good Thing We’re Going to Have to Live with Less Stuff — We’ll Stay Alive on Earth for Longer That Way
The Long Road Ahead — Are You Ready for the Worst the Economy Has to Offer?
California’s Big Chance to Stop Locking up Harmless Drug Offenders
The Debt Trap: How Banks Push Troubled Borrowers Deeper Into Debt
Thirteen Election Integrity Experts: E-Voting Problems and How to Stop Them
Obama vs. McCain: Where Would the Election Be without Net Neutrality? — Media & Technology Voter Guide=
=
My analysis of notorious conservative apologist Ben Steins stated political imperative.
Last night on the Craig Ferguson show, Ben Stein gave his rationalizations for supporting John McCain. He seemed to actively not support Sarah Palin however. Claiming he was never attracted to her, and when he first saw her in person, thought she was someones call girl.
He cavalierly rejected any of Obama’s strengths as mere illusionary. He went on to give his strongest recommendation for McCain, which was, (and I condense the implications of his position); We owe McCain anything he ever wants since he was a prisoner and all. This was termed in this way; ‘I can not turn my back on John McCain. Since he did what he did for us.’ So why do I call such reasoning ugly?
I am sure people like John McCain do not serve their country so they can have a permanent free pass for absolutely anything they decide to do. Turn ones back? It is obviously an ad-hominem idea of persuasion akin to sophistry. We could say that anything anyone once in the military wants to do has an imperative for our support. Well. Then we do not really have a free market or a free country. Implied is; Whenever one from the military runs for office, we cannot turn our backs on them. Now that is a scary precedent custom fit to a military dictatorship.
-
Do all those interrogated and confined at Abu Ghraib, then come home to their respective nations, now all deserve to lead them by this same reasoning; can not ‘turn ones back’ on their soldiers? Where does such reasoning lead? The world is in for horrendous trouble if all or any who fall captive while bravely serving are seen in this light of entitlement. It is a phony reason, seemingly meant to sway the non rational, but those suitable to feeling guilty.
The reasoning is a familiar “logic” on the right; make people guilty and or fearful, and have them act from there. Ignore reality for manipulable emotional “connection”.
It is odd this alleged loyalty to the troops. For which party is most often not helping veterans benefits? Which party implies that the soldiers “know what they are getting into.’, so do not require any more socialistic consideration? McCain, who some feel has unresolved emotional issues from his service, is in the party that tries to not treat PTSD ills acquired by returning troops. I guess being against big government equals cutting veterans benefits as well.
Not turn ones back. It is an insult to all who serve and have served. To think that they are entitled to the keys to run the nation for serving, is quite an insult to our citizens who serve. As if then it is a known that joining the military sets one up for life, and we should owe them absolutely anything they dream up. Including being president since; ‘I cannot turn my back’. A clever piece of pandering propaganda, true. I saw how fast my cousins two volunteer terms as a sniper in Vietnam was forgotten with no societal quilt or culpability shown.
America’s finest serve this nation to do just that; serve and protect it. We honor them by being free to chose as we will, no entitlements, as if in a military dictatorship. We do owe veterans for what they have sacrificed; They may well need health care including emotional care. They my need other job training. They may need more thank you’s from all of us, and more pride shown them for their service. But owe one the presidency? Absurd nonsense in a still free country.
What Ben Stine should be asking himself instead is; What kind of leader would John McCain be, when he is known to have picked Sarah Palin as his first appointment act of his possible presidency? Someone who many, even some noted Republicans believe, demonstrated how little they know of the lower 49, or how government works here. This is who he chose to succeed him, as if the rest of We the People were some kind of a reckless gambling joke.
There may be more to Ben Steins guilty philosophy which we can infer from their places in society. The super rich may well feel quite a debt to one of their owns sacrifice for them. Unfortunately, turning ones back on ones troops as an entitlement for one who served, to be emotionally mandated as a reason to be president is beyond mere harmless opinion. It may well be turning ones back on the very nature of a free country and a free civil society. Seems a luxury some who benefit so much from their societal positions might entertain. But it has little reasonable place in a real democracy. And that is the rub…
Maybe millionaires like Ben Stein, and hundred millionaires like the McCain’s, have a bond here stronger than this ugly interpretation of loyalty given as a just cause for voting last night.
-
——————————————-
More on McCain’s character issue questions
——————————————-
Voice of America |
Economy Among Issues Leading Some Veterans Away From McCain – Oct 29, 2008
|
-
Welcome to the official Facebook Page of Veterans for Obama. Get exclusive content and interact with Veterans for Obama right from Facebook.
-
Another powerful ad from Vote Vets, and they really let Limbaugh have it. Rush can’t help himself as he continues his attacks on our troops and veterans, …
-
From Truthout
McCain’s Integrity
Wednesday 10 September 2008
»
by: Andrew Sullivan, The Atlantic
Senator John McCain at a campaign rally in Virginia. (Photo: Reuters)
Editor’s Note: Historically a John McCain supporter, conservative journalist and blogger Andrew Sullivan takes on the issue of John McCain’s integrity as he strives to win the presidency. – vh/TO
For me, this surreal moment – like the entire surrealism of the past ten days – is not really about Sarah Palin or Barack Obama or pigs or fish or lipstick. It’s about John McCain. The one thing I always thought I knew about him is that he is a decent and honest person. When he knows, as every sane person must, that Obama did not in any conceivable sense mean that Sarah Palin is a pig, what did he do? Did he come out and say so and end this charade? Or did he acquiesce in and thereby enable the mindless Rovianism that is now the core feature of his campaign?
So far, he has let us all down. My guess is he will continue to do so. And that decision, for my part, ends whatever respect I once had for him. On core moral issues, where this man knew what the right thing was, and had to pick between good and evil, he chose evil. When he knew that George W. Bush’s war in Iraq was a fiasco and catastrophe, and before Donald Rumsfeld quit, McCain endorsed George W. Bush against his fellow Vietnam vet, John Kerry in 2004. By that decision, McCain lost any credibility that he can ever put country first. He put party first and his own career first ahead of what he knew was best for the country.
And when the Senate and House voted overwhelmingly to condemn and end the torture regime of Bush and Cheney in 2006, McCain again had a clear choice between good and evil, and chose evil.
He capitulated and enshrined torture as the policy of the United States, by allowing the CIA to use techniques as bad as and worse than the torture inflicted on him in Vietnam. He gave the war criminals in the White House retroactive immunity against the prosecution they so richly deserve. The enormity of this moral betrayal, this betrayal of his country’s honor, has yet to sink in. But for my part, it now makes much more sense. He is not the man I thought he was.
And when he had the chance to engage in a real and substantive debate against the most talented politician of the next generation in a fall campaign where vital issues are at stake, what did McCain do? He began his general campaign with a series of grotesque, trivial and absurd MTV-style attacks on Obama’s virtues and implied disgusting things about his opponent’s patriotism.
And then, because he could see he was going to lose, ten days ago, he threw caution to the wind and with no vetting whatsoever, picked a woman who, by her decision to endure her own eight-month pregnancy of a Down Syndrome child in public, that he was going to reignite the culture war as a last stand against Obama. That’s all that is happening right now: a massive bump in the enthusiasm of the Christianist base. This is pure Rove.
Yes, McCain made a decision that revealed many appalling things about him. In the end, his final concern is not national security. No one who cares about national security would pick as vice-president someone who knows nothing about it as his replacement. No one who cares about this country’s safety would gamble the security of the world on a total unknown because she polled well with the Christianist base. No person who truly believed that the surge was integral to this country’s national security would pick as his veep candidate a woman who, so far as we can tell anything, opposed it at the time.
McCain has demonstrated in the last two months that he does not have the character to be president of the United States. And that is why it is more important than ever to ensure that Barack Obama is the next president. The alternative is now unthinkable. And McCain – no one else – has proved it.
-
JOHN MCCAIN — 61 FLIP-FLOPS AND COUNTING
By Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report
McCain argues that flip-flops are an example of a political
leader who can’t be trusted — so he might as well drop out
of the race.
http://www.alternet.org/election08/90956/
-
Will the Democrats lose again to a rigged election?
Is our democracy an easy to rig fraud?
Having a secret ballot is one thing, but non transparency in voting systems is a road to dictatorship.
A democracy requires its citizens to account for the underlying truth of elections. Surrendering that duty surrenders the nation to authoritarianism.
How did the USA ever get reduced to such corruption of our constitutional core values?
-
Short clip describes the film; murder, spies, voting lies.
-
-
-
-
-
The BRAD BLOG covers your electoral system, fiercely and independently, like no other media outlet in the nation. Please support our work with a donation to …
www.bradblog.com/ – 291k – Cached – Similar pages
-
[The words below are a speculation on some ideas of fractal theory extended into sound and words]
.
fractalcomputer generated patternsfrac1979
.
.
FRACTAL LANGUAGE
numbers drifted through air
fell off of fractured trees
their leaves counting ground
shapes suddenly unveiled mystery
organic mathematical formulas
plowed by segmented worms
soil becoming full of potential
chaos itself grew into order
conquering randomness
taming uncertainty’s
hush of nothingness
with natural algorithms
.
It was only a moments birth
before vibrations showed numbers
words suddenly fell into rhythmic order
vowels red in their heart beating emotion
encased by consonant body’s pointing
these spoke from a numerical center
folding in and unfolding onto
infinite equations of now
an always ever-present
origami sound calls upside
language braking down
until it showed a soul
but Spirit of What
or Whom?
.
How could we now use words
knowing they too are creatures
forged at Life’s Center to shine
much larger than any lone thought?
Do these custodians of consciousness
form out of helix molecular chains?
With their lively interpretations
of crystalline certainty
and it of smaller comment
geometric angles dictation
molecular singularities intent
in calculations of 1’s desire
we guess at what things are.
.
We are wandering
closer still to quark tales
and quintessence confidentiality
language with its broken tongues
its alien misunderstandings
on Babble these waves break
are they all now immaterial
sounds from our 1 center;
this Ghost in the Machine
Cause of eternal Revelation?
With Reason To Wonder A Journey in One Life
RSS - Posts
RSS - Posts
FROM THE MOUTHS OF BABES or kids say the darndest things
Tags: Bible humor, children explain the Bible, from the mouths of babes, funny kids comments, humor
-
This was an e-mail I received without known authors or origin. Yet I think we can all have a non political interlude in this nation. The same nation where during the Pledge of Allegiance I would say; … “and to the Republic where witches stand.”
-
Here it is;
-
KIDS WERE ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS. THE
FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ABOUT THE BIBLE WERE WRITTEN BY CHILDREN. THEY HAVE NOT
BEEN RETOUCHED OR CORRECTED. INCORRECT SPELLING HAS BEEN LEFT IN.
-
1. IN THE FIRST BOOK OF THE BIBLE, GUINESSIS. GOD GOT TIRED OF
CREATING THE WORLD SO HE TOOK THE SABBATH OFF.
2. ADAM AND EVE WERE CREATED FROM AN APPLE TREE. NOAH’S WIFE WAS
JOAN OF ARK. NOAH BUILT AND ARK AND THE ANIMALS CAME ON IN PEARS.
3 .. LOTS WIFE WAS A PILLAR OF SALT DURING THE DAY, BUT A BALL OF FIRE
DURING THE NIGHT.
4. THE JEWS WERE A PROUD PEOPLE AND THROUGHOUT HISTORY THEY HAD
TROUBLE WITH UNSYMPATHETIC GENITALS.
5. SAMPSON WAS A STRONGMAN WHO LET HIMSELF BE LED ASTRAY BY A JEZEBEL
LIKE DELILAH.
6. SAMSON SLAYED THE PHILISTINES WITH THE AXE OF THE APOSTLES.
7. MOSE S LED THE JEWS TO THE RED SEA WHERE THEY MADE UNLEAVENED BREAD
WHICH IS BREAD WITHOUT ANY INGREDIENTS.
8, THE EGYPTIANS WERE ALL DROWNED IN THE DESSERT. AFTERWARDS, MOSES
WENT UP TO MOUNT CYANIDE TO GET THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
9. THE FIRST COMMANDMENTS WAS WHEN EVE TOLD ADAM TO EAT THE APPLE.
10. THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT IS THOU SHALT NOT ADMIT ADULTER Y.
11. MOSES DIED BEFORE HE EVER REACHED CANADA THEN JOSHUA LED THE
HEBREWS IN THE BATTLE OF GERITOL.
12. THE GREATEST MIRICLE IN THE BIBLE IS WHEN JOSHUA TOLD HIS SON TO
STAND STILL AND HE OBEYED HIM.
13. DAVID WAS A HEBREW KING WHO WAS SKILLED AT PLAYING THE LIAR. HE FOUGHT
THE FINKELSTEINS, A RACE OF PEOPLE WHO LIVED IN BIBLICAL TIMES.
14. SOLOMON, ONE OF DAVIDS SONS, HAD 300 WIVES AND 700 PORCUPINES.
15. WHEN MARY HEARD SHE WAS THE MOTHER OF JESUS, SHE SANG THE MAGNA
CARTA.
16. WHEN THE THREE WISE GUYS FROM THE EAST SIDE ARRIVED THEY FOUND
JESUS IN THE MANAGER.
17. JESUS WAS BORN BECAUSE MARY HAD AN IMMACULATE CONTRAPTION.
18. ST. JOHN THE BLACKSMI TH DUMPED WATER ON HIS HEAD.
19. JESUS ENUNCIATED THE GOLDEN RULE, WHICH SAYS TO DO UNTO OTHERS
BEFORE THEY DO ONE TO YOU. HE ALSO EXPLAINED A MAN DOTH NOT LIVE BY SWEAT
ALONE.
20. IT WAS A MIRICLE WHEN JESUS ROSE FROM THE DEAD AND MANAGED TO GET
THE TOMBSTONE OFF THE ENTRANCE.
21. THE PEOPLE WHO FOLLOWED THE LORD WERE CALLED THE 12 DECIBELS.
22. THE EPISTELS WERE THE WIVES OF THE APOSTLES.
23. ONE OF THE OPPOSSUMS WAS ST. MATTHEW WHO WAS ALSO A TAXIMAN.
24. ST. PAUL CAVORTED TO CHRISTIANITY, HE PREACHED HOLY ACRIMONY WHICH
IS ANOTHER NAME FOR MARRAIGE.
25. CHRISTIANS HAVE ONLY ONE SPOUSE. THIS IS CALLED MONOTONY.
-
-