WILL THE REAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES PLEASE STAND UP

NOW IN THE CENTER RING

We have the ex straight talk express looking more like a carnival roller-coaster. We still have the two presidents for one juggling travelling side show. And we have the poet express that gets it steam from color, age differences and dreams all rapped up in handy chants that promise what we have to deliver.

HOW TWO NEGATIVES MAKE A POSITIVE

Completely astounding, is how it is alleged that what the right wing thought was worthy of impeachment to a “liberal”, when coming from the alleged liberal press, may have the ability to unite them behind someone they think does not think like them overall in their party.

Opposites attract?

The center of the corporate world is where? New York City, right? It is amazing after how they (NY Times) were used to sell misleading info on a looming conflict not so long ago historically, they still are the Big, Omnivorous, never ending in their job of undermining America, liberal press.

Fool me 999 times; shame on you. Fool me 1000 times; shame on me!

Naturally then, the anti conservative supposition, is supposedly good enough of an attack from an anti conservative cause, to possibly rally the right behind someone they did not desire. That was until an alleged liberal establishment pointed its finger at him.

Strange how ones apparent enemies condemnation can confirm a thing for someone they would possibly have not considered much of otherwise. At least that is the talk. Liberals real or imagined, by their actions, have the power to change conservative minds to do the opposite of the presumed liberal intent.

Did not the current administration in 2001 have a policy that; if Clinton did it. We (the grown ups) will do the opposite. It sure seemed as if that was one sure thing one could count on them to react to in the reverse.
Simple reverse psychology.

BUT

I suspect the corporate world, including much of the presumed liberal corporate world, might rather have the newborn “conservative” candidate, instead of one who seems to have an agenda being established in the public mind, of intending to hold corporations much more accountable for their impacts on society, justice and democracy. That might effect the old stock portfolios, that provide a socialist like security net for large stock holders. Even liberal ones.

COULD IT BE?

I have not heard this theory presented, but I thought it was odd that the sexual innuendos release came when the dynamic duos slick car suddenly started to sputter as if running on fumes. Now out of the unimaginable blue, the very well to do might have a spotlight beaming at them from parallel quicksilver lines. If so. I can see the cleaver notion of switching the tracks with a liberal tag, to elicit the rights usual knee jerk response.

So predictable. But is it true? Did the mythical beast called the liberal press spread innuendo about their assumed opponent, not to destroy his chances at the oval office, but to aid them?

SURE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE NUTS; EVEN THE TRUE ONES.

YEA RIGHT; WHEN THE COWS COME HOME. Oh they’re here

THESE ARE IN TOWN

REST OF PICS. ARE FROM HOME

COWS AND CATTLE . NO HAT

BELOW THE DAM

AND UP THE HILL

CATTLE THAT LOOK EXACTLY LIKE HORSES

FOOLED ME

(more horse photos are on this site.  Title; HORSES THAT VISIT BELOW OUR DAM)

THE POLITICAL MIND————LESSNESS

It is good we share our points of view on things, including candidates. Good to a point that is.

The hard to believe part, the mind numbing thing is the near constant kind of “plagiarism” that occurs when we repeat talking points as if they were our own meditated enlightenment’s of mind and heart.

The right wing of things have turned this into quite an art and way of life even. ‘Attack them there so they won’t attack us here’, was repeated so often, its out of world and human reaction context was sent down the drain. It was just lately the accusation that those who are against pre emptive actions of war are for the old Nazis winning over the Allies. When, which of those two were actually using the pre emptive concept on their population?

The left wing is full of concepts more like Swiss cheese than anything solid, true. But I am not going into how they pass their own symbolic concept test around to check for purity. This is about we off the Internet common bloggers.

IN MY YOUR OWN WORDS

Today I have read tag post from the left and right, or more accurately in favor of two parties candidates, that are nothing more than regurgitated talking points. One mentioned the badness of the “socialist” agenda by one candidate. I imagine it was not in reference to the current socialism the wealthy enjoy thanks to all our hard efforts, and yes, taxes we will pay one day to cover all their business expenses allegedly for our own good. It must have meant the socialist buzz word chants usually truncated view constantly bombarded at us from one direction.

Then there was one whose few points and short post was about one candidates readiness to start on day one, with experience, maturity or whatever, some word for word talking points being used to sway “followers” away from a certain inspiring candidate. Yeah, all sound bites are meant to tag our brains, but need they push out our own thoughts? If one cannot think for oneself, just say; “I am voting for blank, here is the link to their site so they can tell you all the propaganda I now have absorbed as the reasons why I am voting for them. Thanks.”

Too harsh? Maybe so.

It seems we do not, as a nation in general, know what are good personality traits or kinds of experience to chose one candidate over another. We say experience as if humans do not have experience unless they are on our side. We say leadership, or national security, without a thorough comprehension of what the dimensions of national security are.

It has seemed to be reduced to; will you kill the bad guys for us who are out to wipe us out for good? Get them before they get us? The notion has inherent stupidity encapsulated to time release in it. “No. I am going to let whomever do whatever they wish to us. I am for freedom of all.” This is akin to the answer expected from those against national security types associated, (through much hard work and propagandized expense) to one party.  Just pretend that all this attacking does not create blood feuds to endure through generations, nicely serving varying conservative cults for years and lifetimes to come.  Until obliteration day.

JUST YOU WATCH!

Am I using my precognition powers to deduce how future post will regurgitate endlessly, the talking point sound bites of one side or another? Don’t make me laugh by saying yes! I have sore muscles on my side and you don’t want to hurt me do you?

By the way, I am sure someone has used all these words I am using before, even phrases, I apologise to all of you for taking these words out of your own mouths. I did not mean to. But perhaps you should have claimed them like “fair and balanced” so I could not say them without your permission. Better hurry since I am claiming the legal ownership of all words so I can become unimaginably rich. What? You have already claimed all the letters! Darn!

THE WORDS OF ADVICE FROM WHO KNOWS WHERE

But my friend says he is better, or she is in possession of the right kind of experience. Oh Boy! Democracy! Run for the hills! The clones are coming! The clowns? No the clones! Wait a minute. What did he say they were?